Trump plans to sign EO ending birthright citizenship

buttlick.gif~c200
Keep what you do for the impotent 300+ pound blimp Slartocchio between the two of you, Fredrika.
 
Not going to drift all over the place with you as you lose your focus.

But in general, this is just basic Judicial Rulings 101, where- as part of the remedy phase and ruling of the decision- the courts get to decide whether decisions that adversely affect parties are to be applied retro-actively or going forward or pursuant to a negotiated agreement between the parties on various elements. And would apply to this issue at hand.

Done on this topic for today. Thank you for playing.

Uh. I’m not so sure we can grandfather in something deemed unconstitutional. Can you provide an example of the court doing this, perhaps tomorrow?
 
I would be confident enough that many European countries simply changed to a system where the mother had to be in the country for a short period. I recall the discussions about African mothers arriving days before the baby dropped and hiding this from airline and ferry companies.

This was obviously dangerous for mother and child.

This argument could hold water but it is a rational safety policy not racist bait. Not by fucking tweet and not backed by the usual bullshit exaggeration and lies.

Dems, tell the fucker see you in court after the election and don't chase this laser pointer.


By one of the few you mean one of 34

For the record, the following countries recognize jus soli(Birthright Citizenship):
1 Antigua and Barbuda
2 Argentina
3 Barbados
4 Belize
5 Bolivia
6 Brazil
7 Canada
8 Chile
9 Cuba
10 Dominica
11 Ecuador
12 El Salvador
13 Fiji
14 Grenada
15 Guatemala
16 Guyana
17 Honduras
18 Jamaica
19 Mexico
20 Nicaragua
21 Panama
22 Paraguay
23 Peru
24 Saint Kitts and Nevis
25 Saint Lucia
26 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
27 Trinidad and Tobago
28 United States
29 Uruguay
30 Venezuela

Also US is one of few with electoral college, why not eliminate it as well? Oh, no?
 
You certainly do, Fredrika!
I'm not the one blindly kissing Trump ass. That would be under your purview. Your apparent efforts at deflection suggest that you're conflicted. I would have thought that you would readily acknowledge your affinity to his hind quarters judging by your shameless posts praising his every fuck-up. Seems you are of two minds (neither of which amounts to much).
 
You mean like the 2nd one should be amended (into oblivion)?
Frankly I would not have a problem with the second amendment being revisited to take out some of the ambiguity. I'm not opposed to bringing the constitution into the 21st century. I know that sets me apart from many of my conservative friends, but many of our current day problems are the result of outdated ideology. This would take a congress that actually wanted to solve problems rather than exploit them on the never ending campaign trail. Ain't gonna' happen.
 
Back
Top