Trump looking to overrule SCOTUS decision

You don't care about it either. You use it to rile your base. Democrats are guilty of the exact same thing they are going after Trump about in regards to driving a narrative.

That said, the President has no authority to overturn the Supreme Court. That's the whole point of the separation of powers concept.

Nope, I care. Most humans with some modicum of compassion do too.
 
Last edited:
Nope, I care. Most humans with some modicum of compassion do too.

Ah, sorry, I didn't realize you were so passionate about it. Can you point me to all the posts that were so critical when the Obama administration was doing similar type activities? Even if they were under a different alias, I'll gladly accept that as proof of your concern.
 
Ah, sorry, I didn't realize you were so passionate about it. Can you point me to all the posts that were so critical when the Obama administration was doing similar type activities? Even if they were under a different alias, I'll gladly accept that as proof of your concern.

Define similar?
Record deportations?
I was vocal about it, but he did prioritize people with felonies and certain types of serious misdemeanors.

Child separations?
Only happened for those with criminal records. For crossers, only a few hours as they were processed.

Child detention?
In addition to the above, only those unaccompanied minors crossing without adults. They would parole minors into families in the US, but what are you going to do with the rest other than coordinate with child services (which they did)?

Detention conditions?
Yes it was cramped, but you're in denial if you think it was anywhere close to the same deplorable state under Trump. Hell, Obama pulled contracts from for-profit prisons for beginning to pull this crap, and that was for adult centers.

I think it's cute that you still think I was around these forums under a different alias and hence not vocal about Obama's treatment, so I'll let you continue on believing it.
 
Define similar?
Record deportations?
I was vocal about it, but he did prioritize people with felonies and certain types of serious misdemeanors.

Child separations?
Only happened for those with criminal records. For crossers, only a few hours as they were processed.

Child detention?
In addition to the above, only those unaccompanied minors crossing without adults. They would parole minors into families in the US, but what are you going to do with the rest other than coordinate with child services (which they did)?

Detention conditions?
Yes it was cramped, but you're in denial if you think it was anywhere close to the same deplorable state under Trump. Hell, Obama pulled contracts from for-profit prisons for beginning to pull this crap, and that was for adult centers.

I think it's cute that you still think I was around these forums under a different alias and hence not vocal about Obama's treatment, so I'll let you continue on believing it.

"I was vocal about it then, too!"

That is cute.

No one here believes you just showed up to EliteTrader one day for the first time and went straight to the politics section.
 
"I was vocal about it then, too!"

That is cute.

No one here believes you just showed up to EliteTrader one day for the first time and went straight to the politics section.

You're right, no one does, because that's not what I did.

Your lack of memory makes everything clear now. We've had this "conversation" before remember grandpa?

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...t-of-the-free-press-from-the-wh.332453/page-5

May want to get that checked out. Paranoid delusions and amnesia aren't a good sign.
 
Last edited:
I'll get it checked out.

But no one here believes you showed up one day and went right down to the politics section.

That's right, no one believes that because I went to the stock or options section. Unless you want to correct that statement a second time.
 
What part of the word illegal don't they understand?

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...rney-general-barr-commerce-secretary-n1030901


House votes to hold AG Barr and Commerce chief Ross in criminal contempt over census
Wilbur Ross derided the effort as nothing but "political theater" and "silly."

The House voted Wednesday to hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in criminal contempt of Congress for obstructing a probe into the administration's failed bid to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.

The criminal contempt resolution passed by a vote of 230-198. It passed along party lines — no Republicans voted in favor. Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan, now an independent after leaving the GOP earlier this month, voted in favor of the move. Four Democrats voted against it.White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham blasted the vote as "ridiculous and yet another lawless attempt to harass the President and his Administration.
 
Back
Top