Trump itching to fire the fed

Alright. Let's put the shoe on the other foot now. Name, and give a nice Wiki Link to, any two "investigations not finding something wrong with Trump" , investigations currently underway do not count. I'm waiting. I'm patiently waiting.:D:D

So you want me to give you wiki links to a guy who has been in office for 3 years vs. someone who has had issue after issue for the last 30?
 
Alright. Let's put the shoe on the other foot now. Name, and give a nice Wiki Link to, any two "investigations not finding something wrong with Trump" , investigations currently underway do not count. I'm waiting. I'm patiently waiting.:D:D

Tsing's gone full GWB. "You gave me no other option but to vote for Trump because they're all corrupt! Please believe me!"
 
So you want me to give you wiki links to a guy who has been in office for 3 years vs. someone who has had issue after issue for the last 30?
Yup, because he's been a crime boss for 30. But it's OK. I know I asked you to do the impossible. Only Trump has demonstrated he can accomplish the seemingly impossible by being even more corrupt than Nixon. Being just a little more corrupt than the Republican average is nothing to crow about. But Trump is going to set new all time records.
 
Tsing's gone full GWB. "You gave me no other option but to vote for Trump because they're all corrupt! Please believe me!"

Actually it was more of a SCOTUS concern, which proved to be valid. If that makes me GWB, I'm cool with that.
 
Yup, because he's been a crime boss for 30. But it's OK. I know I asked you to do the impossible. Only Trump has demonstrated he can accomplish the seemingly impossible by being even more corrupt than Nixon. Being just a little more corrupt than the Republican average is nothing to crow about. But Trump is going to set new all time records.

Blah blah blah OrangeMan Bad wah wah.
 
Blah blah blah OrangeMan Bad wah wah.
Should we be asking, has he really kept his promises or is he just saying he has? Are you doing a lot better now than in 2016? Look at the picture in front of you solely from the standpoint of your personal best interests, and act accordingly. If everyone does that we'll all be just fine.
 
Exactly. They're fabricating crimes to suit the pre determined conclusions that Trump must be guilty and that is clearly illegal and unconstitutional.
This really puzzles me. The whistle blower came to the House Intelligence Committee Staff with a claim that Trump seemed to have violated U.S. law. He/She was very specific about what the crime was. The Staff referred the whistle blower to the Inspector Generals Office. The Inspector General found the claim credible. It is this specific alleged crime that is the focus of the House Intelligence Committee. I am not able to understand how this can be construed by anyone as a "Witch Hunt" or a "fabrication" of crimes.
 
Should we be asking, has he really kept his promises or is he just saying he has? Are you doing a lot better now than in 2016? Look at the picture in front of you solely from the standpoint of your personal best interests, and act accordingly. If everyone does that we'll all be just fine.


I was never a fan of this analysis view, "are you better off now than you were 4 years ago" because me being better off is about what work I have done or how my business has gone past 4 years and has really nothing to do with the President.
It is almost insulting to me that a Prez is going to try and take credit for me doing better than I was 4 years ago as though he had something to do with it.

If you work for a company and they shutdown and you lose your job, it is not fair for the challenger to blame the Prez to get you to vote for them.

Whatever happened over last 4 years has shit to do with the prez but they want to take credit for it. @#$% that.

Economies go into expansion and contraction mostly on their own and where we are in the economy when entering a presidential election is just coincidence timing.
 

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/367541-fbi-launches-new-clinton-foundation-investigation


FBI launches new Clinton Foundation investigation

By John Solomon - 01/04/18 08:35 PM EST

The Justice Department has launched a new inquiry into whether the Clinton Foundation engaged in any pay-to-play politics or other illegal activities while Hillary Clinton served as secretary of State, law enforcement officials and a witness tells The Hill.

FBI agents from Little Rock, Ark., where the foundation was started, have taken the lead in the investigation and have interviewed at least one witness in the last month, and law enforcement officials said additional activities are expected in the coming weeks.

The officials, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said the probe is examining whether the Clintons promised or performed any policy favors in return for largesse to their charitable efforts or whether donors made commitments of donations in hopes of securing government outcomes.

The probe may also examine whether any tax-exempt assets were converted for personal or political use and whether the foundation complied with applicable tax laws, the officials said.

One witness recently interviewed by the FBI described the session to The Hill as “extremely professional and unquestionably thorough” and focused on questions about whether donors to Clinton charitable efforts received any favorable treatment from the Obama administration on a policy decision previously highlighted in media reports.

The witness discussed his interview solely on the grounds of anonymity. He said the agents were from Little Rock and their questions focused on government decisions and discussions of donations to Clinton entities during the time Hillary Clinton led President Obama's State Department.

The FBI office in Little Rock referred a reporter Thursday to Washington headquarters, where officials declined any official comment.

Clinton's chief spokesman, Nick Merrill, on Friday morning excoriated the FBI for re-opening the case, calling the probe "disgraceful" and suggesting it was nothing more than a political distraction from President Trump's Russia controversies.

"Let’s call this what it is: a sham," Merrill said. "This is a philanthropy that does life-changing work, which Republicans have tried to turn into a political football. It began with a now long-debunked project spearheaded by Steve Bannon during the presidential campaign. It continues with Jeff Sessions doing Trump’s bidding by heeding his calls to meddle with a department that is supposed to function independently."

Foundation spokesman Craig Minassian took a more muted response, saying the new probe wouldn't distract the charity from its daily work.

“Time after time, the Clinton Foundation has been subjected to politically motivated allegations, and time after time these allegations have been proven false. None of this has made us waver in our mission to help people," Minassian said. "The Clinton Foundation has demonstrably improved the lives of millions of people across America and around the world while earning top ratings from charity watchdog groups in the process."
The Wall Street Journal reported late last year that several FBI field offices, including the one in Little Rock, had been collecting information on the Clinton Foundation for more than a year. The report also said there had been pushback to the FBI from the Justice Department.

A renewed law enforcement focus follows a promise to Congress late last year from top Trump Justice Department officials that law enforcement would revisit some of the investigations and legal issues closed during the Obama years that conservatives felt were given short shrift. It also follows months of relentless criticism on Twitter from President Trump, who has repeatedly questioned why no criminal charges were ever filed against the “crooked” Clintons and their fundraising machine.

For years, news media from The New York Times to The Daily Caller have reported countless stories on donations to the Clinton Foundation or speech fees that closely fell around the time of favorable decisions by Clinton's State Department. Conservative author Peter Schweizer chronicled the most famous of episodes in his book "Clinton Cash" that gave ammunition to conservatives, including Trump, to beat the drum for a renewed investigation.

Several GOP members of Congress have recently urged Attorney General Jeff Sessions to appoint a special counsel to look at the myriad issues surrounding the Clintons. Justice officials sent a letter to Congress in November suggesting some of those issues were being re-examined, but Sessions later testified the appointment of a special prosecutor required a high legal bar that had not yet been met.

Officials also said the Justice Department was re-examining whether there are any unresolved issues from the closed case into Clinton's transmission of classified information through her personal email server. Former FBI Director James Comey in 2016 concluded Clinton was “extremely careless” in handling that classified information and that there was some evidence of legal violations, but he declined to recommend charges on the grounds that he could not prove Clinton and her top aides intended to break the law.

His decision was roundly criticized by Republicans, and recent revelations that his statement was watered down by edits and that he made the decision before all witness interviews were finished have led to renewed criticism.

A senior law enforcement official said the Justice Department was exploring whether any issues from that probe should be re-opened but cautioned the effort was not at the stage of a full investigation.

One challenge for any Clinton-era investigation is that the statute of limitations on most federal felonies is five years, and Clinton left office in early 2013.
 
I was never a fan of this analysis view, "are you better off now than you were 4 years ago" because me being better off is about what work I have done or how my business has gone past 4 years and has really nothing to do with the President.
It is almost insulting to me that a Prez is going to try and take credit for me doing better than I was 4 years ago as though he had something to do with it.

If you work for a company and they shutdown and you lose your job, it is not fair for the challenger to blame the Prez to get you to vote for them.

Whatever happened over last 4 years has shit to do with the prez but they want to take credit for it. @#$% that.

Economies go into expansion and contraction mostly on their own and where we are in the economy when entering a presidential election is just coincidence timing.
Very well said and very true. But there may be exceptions. And Trump may be one of them. Many of us are going to do worse specifically because of him! He's a chaos creator and a disaster for some. If you're a farmer or involved in a business affected by tariffs or heightened uncertainty in markets, or if you are an immigrant or even a green card holder then you understand what I am referring to. And long term harm of the Trump Presidency on things such as air and water quality may only be evident after Trump is gone. There are as yet unknown consequences of our abandoning Northern Syria to Turkey and Russia, and our delay of military assistance to the Ukraine facilitating further losses to Russian invasion in Northeast Ukraine. The consequences could potentially extend to future, lost lives of young Americans. And too, how long will it take to repair Trump's damage done to relations with our European Allies? These are all things that may be laid directly at Trumps feet.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top