Trump is registered to vote in two states, voter fraud?

This is very dangerous ground for Trump. By pushing this voter fraud agenda the only thing he has to gain is ego, but to do that, he has to show over 3MM of fraudulent votes. If instead, his commission shows just a few certain counties or states with some fraudulent voting, it can undermine the entire legitimacy of his victory.

Not to mention that if Russia (or some domestic manipulator) did somehow break into the election system, it's clear that they wouldn't be doing it in California but rather Florida, Ohio and other swing states, which "voted" in favor of Trump.

It's like the Patriots demanding the Seahawks replay that last play in Superbowl 49.

It makes you wonder how unstable he is. Any rational Trump supporter should fear this whole political discourse.
 
It was political

"
According to Sharman's report, former ALEA head Spencer Collier understood Mason's intentions were to have the plan "rolled out in a way that had limited impact on Government Bentley's political allies."

Collier, according to the report, claims he then reported the closure plan to then-Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange's office because he was concerned about a Voting Rights Act violation.

"

This entire story is a classic example of the left trying to build a mountain out of a mole-hill. It actually detracts from their cause since while there may actually be examples of voter suppression in Alabama; this is not one of them. By running with this false narrative and ignoring the actual facts, the left hurts itself since the "controversy" quickly comes to naught with the least bit of sunlight, and future legitimate issues are ignored. In fact by framing this as a voting issue, the left already missed the actual issue which is the mistreatment of poor rural counties in regards to government services.

The below from the comments - sums it up:

"I just object to using false – or at the very least highly misleading – information to do so. I believe the closures represent bad policy for a host of reasons, not the least of which is the failure of lawmakers to perform their duties in a way that would have prevented the need for the closures in the first place. But they were not an attempt to suppress the black vote. Only a group of people very bad at voter suppression would have done it that way, and I think we can all agree that this is not a group of people bad at voter suppression."
 
This entire story is a classic example of the left trying to build a mountain out of a mole-hill. It actually detracts from their cause since while there may actually be examples of voter suppression in Alabama; this is not one of them. By running with this false narrative and ignoring the actual facts, the left hurts itself since the "controversy" quickly comes to naught with the least bit of sunlight, and future legitimate issues are ignored. In fact by framing this as a voting issue, the left already missed the actual issue which is the mistreatment of poor rural counties in regards to government services.

The below from the comments - sums it up:

"I just object to using false – or at the very least highly misleading – information to do so. I believe the closures represent bad policy for a host of reasons, not the least of which is the failure of lawmakers to perform their duties in a way that would have prevented the need for the closures in the first place. But they were not an attempt to suppress the black vote. Only a group of people very bad at voter suppression would have done it that way, and I think we can all agree that this is not a group of people bad at voter suppression."

The mountain being that 8 of the 10 counties with the most minorities was targeted by Governor's mistress who said it was political. You can keep quoting comments, I will stick to local reporting. This is not something isolated, Republicans have been caught admitting these tactics in the past.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/17/...eraging-voter-id-laws-for-political-gain.html
 
The mountain being that 8 of the 10 counties with the most minorities was targeted by Governor's mistress who said it was political. You can keep quoting comments, I will stick to local reporting. This is not something isolated, Republicans have been caught admitting these tactics in the past.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/17/...eraging-voter-id-laws-for-political-gain.html

So the best you can do is local left-wing reporting from an Indie newspaper, and a NYT article which is not relevant to the DMV situation is Alabama.

Which part of crying "wolf" do you not understand? Cry it often enough and everyone will ignore you when a real wolf shows up.
 
Every bit of this is so silly, when a very simple, highly reliable and inexpensive solution is at hand. But we can't do the obvious because politicians are as corrupt as Wall Street and each State is like and independent kingdom. We will never agree to the obvious. But we do pretty well considering we are hampered by our own nature and a two-hundred-plus year-old Constitution that was written when nothing moved faster than a horse. I mean things could be worse.
 
So the best you can do is local left-wing reporting from an Indie newspaper, and a NYT article which is not relevant to the DMV situation is Alabama.

Which part of crying "wolf" do you not understand? Cry it often enough and everyone will ignore you when a real wolf shows up.

You are literally quoting anonymous comments on these articles and then complaining about the reporting.

Voter suppression is a fact, Republicans have admitted to it and caught doing it. Next you will tell me that gerrymandering isn't the reason Republicans control the House which is again, another way to cheat in elections.
 
You are literally quoting anonymous comments on these articles and then complaining about the reporting.

Voter suppression is a fact, Republicans have admitted to it and caught doing it. Next you will tell me that gerrymandering isn't the reason Republicans control the House which is again, another way to cheat in elections.

Can you refute any of the facts presented in the well-informed comment from the article link your posted? Have a go at refuting the facts.

I have stated that I am opposed to gerrymandering and states need to have independent commissions establish election district boundaries and stop gerrymandering. The state I live in is one of the worse examples of gerrymandering in the country; federal courts have ruled NC must redo both their congressional and state legislature boundaries due to gerrymandering.

I am opposed to voter suppression. I have stated previously the exact practices I am opposed to using NC as an example. However the one thing I do support is picture voter id (as done in most democratic nations) - as long as there is a work-around to allow non picture-id holders to submit provisional ballot.
 
Can you refute any of the facts presented in the well-informed comment from the article link your posted? Have a go at refuting the facts.

I have stated that I am opposed to gerrymandering and states need to have independent commissions establish election district boundaries and stop gerrymandering. The state I live in is one of the worse examples of gerrymandering in the country; federal courts have ruled NC must redo both their congressional and state legislature boundaries due to gerrymandering.

I am opposed to voter suppression. I have stated previously the exact practices I am opposed to using NC as an example. However the one thing I do support is picture voter id (as done in most democratic nations) - as long as there is a work-around to allow non picture-id holders to submit provisional ballot.

No interest in researching anonymous comments, I already proved it's main point wrong when it ignored that 8 of the 10 most populated minority counties were on the hit list
 
No interest in researching anonymous comments, I already proved it's main point wrong when it ignored that 8 of the 10 most populated minority counties were on the hit list

Amusing that you make that assertion without any context. Just how many populated minority counties are there in the state. Is there population decreasing? Are their DMV operations under-utilized? So many points addressed by the comments you ignored. Not to mention the fact that they can get a voting picture id for free at the county courthouse.
 
Amusing that you make that assertion without any context. Just how many populated minority counties are there in the state.

Of the 10 MOST POPULATED minority counties, 8 were targeted, that's the context and it's damning.

Is there population decreasing? Are their DMV operations under-utilized?

Those were not the considerations according to the investigative report and the guys in charge.
 
Back
Top