Trump Indictment Monday Odds and Predictions

you guys listen to the young turk guy... correct?

go to 8 minutes and 9 seconds.... when cenk explains... how corrupt it was ...
Why the fuck can't just one of you neo traitors admit to this.
its plain to anyone with an above 100 IQ that clinton taking money as clinton was approving the deal was corrupt.



 
Last edited:
jem said:
you guys listen to the young turk guy... correct?

go to 8 minutes and 9 seconds.... when cenk explains... how corrupt it was ...
Why the fuck can't just one of you neo traitors admit to this.
its plain to anyone with an above 100 IQ that clinton taking money as clinton was approving the deal was corrupt.



More...


Hey nimrod, the deal was not for her to approve, her department's ONE vote in the committee among nine gets to object and that's all.

Stop lying like your pedo messiah.

Secondly, if it is corruption, why isn't Trump DOJ investigating this? Why would anyone believe people like you who post lies like fake peer reviewed papers, how do we know this is not fake nonsense either?
 
I'm sure Hillary is next



08aaa7a9a5015f0af016ae6d6cb9156d.gif
 
jem said:
you don't know what the hell you are talking about.
it has been reported that the uranium did leave the country for processing in Canada and some of it did not come back.
More...
Get a grip. You need to spend more time at the Ballet and less at Zero Hedge and Fox News.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
The facts have yet to be established. Everyone who follows the uranium deal gets the talking point that there were nine on the committee, blah, blah, blah. ad nauseum.

One of the questions to be resolved though is: Were they all aware that the FBI had an active, ongoing investigation of the deal and the Russian connection at the time the committee voted? And if they did not, why were they not aware?

Would they all have been so eager to vote if Holder and Mueller gave them sufficient information to make an informed decision in the country's interest? I mean no one doubts that it did not matter to Hillary. As long as the cash register was ringing over at the Clinton foundation she didn't give a Shiite about anything.

Also, were any other members of the committee on the take from the Russians as the Clintons were? Has that been fully investigated? We want to be extra thorough about looking into all Russian connections right?
More...
I don't suppose it would occur to you that the FBI involvement might have been into allegations of illegal, in the U.S., business practices by Russian principles (the Russians don't have the same standards as we) and later, on behalf of the committee that was charged with looking into certain types of transactions.

You may be confusing the "Clinton Foundation", which does a lot of good work around the world, with Bill and Hillary Clinton who are private citizens. Money donated to the Clinton Foundation is not being donated to members of the Clinton family. The Clintons are very much in the public eye; hardly anything they do goes unnoticed. If any money donated to the Foundation was being used by the Clintons for their personal benefit, that would be illegal. Rest assured that someone would notice, and the Clintons would be in serious hot water.

These conspiracy theories, of which there is no shortage on the internet, are rather Silly, don't you think.
 
Last edited:
If there is right now any one person who is a more serious threat to social stability in the United States than any other person, including Donald Trump, it may be Rupert Murdoch. He is an enigma. He doesn't appear to harbor any particular malice toward the countries he operates in. To all appearances he is simply a business man who has found a way through innuendo and promotion of conspiracy theories to capture the public interest and thus audience share for his media empire.

But something is lacking in him that we sorely need in the world of business and money making. He would seem to be a person only concerned with making money; someone without any shred of responsibility; someone devoid of concern for the ill affects his yellow journalism may have on public welfare and social stability. He seems to be a person without a conscience. In other words, a person without an inner feeling or voice acting as a guide to the rightness or wrongness of his actions.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top