Trump Indictment Monday Odds and Predictions

exGOPer

exGOPer

High odds
Flynn and Manafort

Medium odds
Kushner
Ivanka
Don Jr
Roger Stone
Carter Page

Low odds
Bannon
Lewkandowski
Cohen


https://www.predictit.org/Browse/Group/84

Another interesting point : Dana Boente resigned as Virginia federal prosecutor because he's in line to be acting attorney general overseeing Mueller if Rosenstein is fired, and he expects Rosenstein to get fired as well as anyone who refuses to fire Mueller

If Trump fires Mueller, it's Saturday Night Massacre all over again.
 
buzzfeed "has learned"... manafort made about a dozen wires in 2012 ad 13 that look like he may have been laundering money.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/jasonleopo...picious-wire?utm_term=.xo2PgebE3N#.ruzQV9ybD1

I wonder if this is the subject of what Mueller filed under seal.
If that is all it is... that would be seen as a win for Trump.

I am not saying that is all it is... but if it is it is it sure would look like Mueller had to rush something out to counter the Wall Street Journal's opinion that he should not be running this investigation due to Uranium One fallout.
 
Last edited:
jem said:
I am not saying that is all it is... but if it is it is it sure would look like Mueller had to rush something out to counter the Wall Street Journal's opinion that he should not be running this investigation due to Uranium One fallout.
More...

Delusional thinking at its finest.Mueller doesn't give a shit about the opinions of Rupert Murdochs media
 
can delusional people actually determine what a delusion is.
once again you prove by example that they have trouble distinguishing delusion from reality.

its not just up to Mueller....
if public opinion is swayed enough, trump can fire him without too much downside.

Mueller is looking pretty tarnished right now due to the Uranium One fallout.

however... my suggested course of action is that special separate counsel be employed to investigate Uranium One, The dossier funding, the dnc breaking, the foreigners working with hillary and the dnc (like humas ties to the muslim brother hood and the Pakis doing IT) and the Uranium One scandal. That counsel should investigate the improper ties between Comey, Mueller, McCabe, Rosenstien and the dnc, obama and hillary.
 
Last edited:
jem said:
can delusional people actually determine what a delusion is.
once again you prove by example that they have trouble distinguishing delusion from reality.

its not just up to Mueller....
if public opinion is swayed enough, trump can fire him without too much downside.

Mueller is looking pretty tarnished right now due to the Uranium One fallout.

however... my suggested course of action is that special separate counsel be employed to investigate Uranium One, The dossier funding, the dnc breaking, the foreigners working with hillary and the dnc (like humas ties to the muslim brother hood and the Pakis doing IT) and the Uranium One scandal. That counsel should investigate the improper ties between Comey, Mueller, McCabe, Rosenstien and the dnc, obama and hillary.
More...

Fire Mueller and this administration is over.

And there is no Uranium fallout, Mueller had nothing to do with it and you guys can't even prove how Clinton was even needed in a deal so unanimous - let alone her influencing the entire government for a deal nobody objected to

But keep the deflections going, they will help with coping when this criminal administration ends.
 
and furthermore no U.S. Uranium went to Russia. The Russians acquired or bought into a Canadian company that had a stake in a U.S. mine. That's all. Clinton wasn't even directly involved in the decision to let the deal go through. The state department was actually represented by someone else on the committee that had to approve the deal, and the State Department had only one vote out of 9. The decision was unanimous. Russia does not need U.S. Uranium. This is a non-issue. So grow up and stop infesting these fora with unfounded, childish innuendo.
 
piezoe said:
and furthermore no U.S. Uranium went to Russia. The Russians acquired or bought into a Canadian company that had a stake in a U.S. mine. That's all. Clinton wasn't even directly involved in the decision to let the deal go through. The state department was actually represented by someone else on the committee that had to approve the deal, and the State Department had only one vote out of 9. The decision was unanimous. Russia does not need U.S. Uranium. This is a non-issue. So grow up and stop infesting these fora with unfounded, childish innuendo.
More...

Russia actually exports Uranium to Russia, US production is like 0.4% of world's uranium, who is gonna give 100s of million in bribe for something so irrelevant.

Also, the bribery case they are referring to has got nothing to do with Clintons, a Tea Party lawyer called Toensig who peddles conspiracy theories says her client has some info that not even the deputy director of FBI at the time was told. It's just deflection from coming Mueller indictments.
 
piezoe said:
The state department was actually represented by someone else on the committee that had to approve the deal, and the State Department had only one vote out of 9. The decision was unanimous. .
More...

The facts have yet to be established. Everyone who follows the uranium deal gets the talking point that there were nine on the committee, blah, blah, blah. ad nauseum.

One of the questions to be resolved though is: Were they all aware that the FBI had an active, ongoing investigation of the deal and the Russian connection at the time the committee voted? And if they did not, why were they not aware?

Would they all have been so eager to vote if Holder and Mueller gave them sufficient information to make an informed decision in the country's interest? I mean no one doubts that it did not matter to Hillary. As long as the cash register was ringing over at the Clinton foundation she didn't give a Shiite about anything.

Also, were any other members of the committee on the take from the Russians as the Clintons were? Has that been fully investigated? We want to be extra thorough about looking into all Russian connections right?
 
you don't know what the hell you are talking about.
it has been reported that the uranium did leave the country for processing in Canada and some of it did not come back.



piezoe said:
and furthermore no U.S. Uranium went to Russia. The Russians acquired or bought into a Canadian company that had a stake in a U.S. mine. That's all. Clinton wasn't even directly involved in the decision to let the deal go through. The state department was actually represented by someone else on the committee that had to approve the deal, and the State Department had only one vote out of 9. The decision was unanimous. Russia does not need U.S. Uranium. This is a non-issue. So grow up and stop infesting these fora with unfounded, childish innuendo.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top