Trump Calls Off Cold War II

[Good1]

I'm not clicking on your garbage however if it is not the original Russia 1 prop-doc it will be a company like my buddy's 'production company' in Bolivia who take short material like that and made it into 2-3 hour long rambling crap for idiot conspiracy junkies (or to assist lobbyists).

No its not like Sasha Boring Cohen who tricks people for idiot consumption which I don't click on.

If you want to prove something you may have to go into a lot of detail, hence, the documentary.

There is such a thing as fast forward if you think the evidence is being presented too slow.

What conspiracy are you talking about? Browders conspiracy about how police conspired to steal corporate docs to steal three companies and their assets, while conspiring with the Russian treasury to refund $230 million in taxes that had already been paid the year before? You mean THAT tin foil conspiracy?

 

[Slartibartfast]

No its not like Sasha Boring Cohen who tricks people for idiot consumption which I don't click on.

If you want to prove something you may have to go into a lot of detail, hence, the documentary.

There is such a thing as fast forward if you think the evidence is being presented too slow.

What conspiracy are you talking about? Browders conspiracy about how police conspired to steal corporate docs to steal three companies and their assets, while conspiring with the Russian treasury to refund $230 million in taxes that had already been paid the year before? You mean THAT tin foil conspiracy?

You are watching a doc based on another from a Russian State media in all likelihood. You don't know up from down or left from right.

Don't ask anyone to step into your confusion. Research the people giving you the information before you lick their ass gravy while smacking your lips.

 

[Good1]

It will be pro-Russian propaganda through and through if you followed the money and who benefits.

Actually, the documentary follows the money better than Browsers has followed the money.

Only traitors watch this disinformation puke designed to seed doubt into the minds of fucking morons like yourself who are looking for something that strokes their existing bias.

Well ur not US so you don't have to worry about being a traitor. But you do have to worry about being a bigot who looks only through the lens of an existing bias, Browers official narrative, as unbelievable as it is on its face.

I'm not saying bigots are fucking morons. I'm just saying you meet the profile of a bigot. How do you know it's disinformation if you don't know the information it presents?

 

[Good1]

You are watching a doc based on another from a Russian State media in all likelihood. You don't know up from down or left from right.

Don't ask anyone to step into your confusion. Research the people giving you the information before you lick their ass gravy while smacking your lips.

You don't know how associated this documentary is to any official Russian narrative, if at all. So you don't know up down left right while you claim you'll never click on it.

You are saying Putins administration has never spoken the truth and never will?

Or who is this Russian State you speak of? Sounds racist.

Meanwhile, you have blindly carried water for Brower, whose side of the story I'm familiar with. But while you refuse to vet the other side of the story, it appears you do lick Browers ass after carrying the water.

 

[Slartibartfast]

You don't know how associated this documentary is to any official Russian narrative, if at all. So you don't know up down left right while you claim you'll never click on it.

You are saying Putins administration has never spoken the truth and never will?

Or who is this Russian State you speak of? Sounds racist.

Meanwhile, you have blindly carried water for Brower, whose side of the story I'm familiar with. But while you refuse to vet the other side of the story, it appears you do lick Browers ass after carrying the water.

You are like a toddler getting attention by running about with a leaking nappy. The perfect sucker for the Russian propaganda machine.

Too stupid to know you are stupid but hey..

 

[Slartibartfast]

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/arts/after-a-week-of-russian-propaganda-i-was-questioning-everything

After a week of Russian propaganda, I was questioning everything
Arts May 2, 2018 4:25 PM EDT
One day this past fall on my morning commute from D.C. to Virginia, I tuned the radio to 105.5 FM, expecting to hear my usual bluegrass. But instead of fiddles and guitar, I heard a voice in Russian-accented English announce: “This is Radio Sputnik.”

I had no idea then what Radio Sputnik was. What came to mind was Sputnik 1, the first artificial satellite, which triggered the Space Race between the U.S. and Soviet Union during the Cold War. The beach-ball sized satellite, once launched, didn’t do much besides orbit the Earth beeping, but it played on American fears and anxieties about being technologically behind, serving as powerful Soviet propaganda.

Enter Radio Sputnik. Like its sister outlet RT, Sputnik is a Russian government-funded media outlet, widely seen by Russia experts as a vehicle to disseminate disinformation for the Kremlin, and, like its space-dwelling namesake, to make the West look bad. While RT is television, Sputnik lives on the radio, a wire service and website. Both RT and Sputnik are under the banner of the news agency “Rossiya Segodnya,” which means “Russia Today,” and which was created in December 2013 by presidential decree by Vladimir Putin.

Both outlets, according to Ben Nimmo, an information defense fellow with the Atlantic Council, a Washington think tank, put out propaganda intended to polarize and confuse, and “attack the facts rather than report them.”

Continues...

 

[vanzandt]

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/arts/after-a-week-of-russian-propaganda-i-was-questioning-everything

After a week of Russian propaganda, I was questioning everything
Arts May 2, 2018 4:25 PM EDT
One day this past fall on my morning commute from D.C. to Virginia, I tuned the radio to 105.5 FM, expecting to hear my usual bluegrass. But instead of fiddles and guitar, I heard a voice in Russian-accented English announce: “This is Radio Sputnik.”

I had no idea then what Radio Sputnik was. What came to mind was Sputnik 1, the first artificial satellite, which triggered the Space Race between the U.S. and Soviet Union during the Cold War. The beach-ball sized satellite, once launched, didn’t do much besides orbit the Earth beeping, but it played on American fears and anxieties about being technologically behind, serving as powerful Soviet propaganda.

Enter Radio Sputnik. Like its sister outlet RT, Sputnik is a Russian government-funded media outlet, widely seen by Russia experts as a vehicle to disseminate disinformation for the Kremlin, and, like its space-dwelling namesake, to make the West look bad. While RT is television, Sputnik lives on the radio, a wire service and website. Both RT and Sputnik are under the banner of the news agency “Rossiya Segodnya,” which means “Russia Today,” and which was created in December 2013 by presidential decree by Vladimir Putin.

Both outlets, according to Ben Nimmo, an information defense fellow with the Atlantic Council, a Washington think tank, put out propaganda intended to polarize and confuse, and “attack the facts rather than report them.”

Continues...

And...? Is there a point to be found here?
Whats for breakfast today down there?

 

[Slartibartfast]

And...? Is there a point to be found here?
Whats for breakfast today down there?

Today we are having.. AllBran with a peach and coffee.

 

[Good1]

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018...tens-cyprus-article-7-over-russian-assistance


Browder-Gate Broadens - EU Threatens Cyprus With 'Article 7' Over Russian Assistance