Trump Adopts AAA Immigration Policy: No More Muslims

as absurd as it sounds, and we don't have all the details as to how it will go down. It is a start in the right direction, at minimum it is being acknowledged and offered as a viable solution. d08 is correct, the US has been fucking around over there for years. it time to retrace, lock up and hunker down.
 
If you want to see how insane of an idea it is to simply ban all muslims here is an excercise for you, would you rather take in a muslim who has lived for 25 years in Canada, or someone who claims to be a christian from Syria?

If your answer is the latter then it is you who isnt excercising good judgement.

Im fine with banning all syrian refugees but trying to ban only muslim refugees, and allowing in "So called" Christian refugees would simply create another hole where extremists are going to take advantage of the loophole.

Id far rather have a Canadian Muslim immigrant than a syrian christian immigrant, and if you cant see why, then you arent paying attention.

For the legitimate Syrian Christian refugees, sorry, but you guys get fucked for the same reason the Syrian muslim refugees do, there is simply no way to vet them.



There is a reason why even the muslim countries like Saudi Arabia dont want to take in the immigrants from syria, and im sure theyd be happy to take in more muslims if they knew who was who.

1. DUH! That's our problem, too. And if you can't tell "who is who", you take none of them in. (The Saudis have air-conditioned, high quality, "tent cities" to accommodate 3 MILLION travelers in the Hajj pilgrimage... which sit idle for nearly all of the year...yet they take in NONE of the "refugees".... that's because they are not "refugees" at all.) Our people should NOT (1) be subjected to the risk of Muslim terrorists/rapists, nor (2) be forced to financially support Muslim invaders.... regardless of American politicians' greedy, power-hungry motivations.
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: d08
If you want to see how insane of an idea it is to simply ban all muslims here is an excercise for you, would you rather take in a muslim who has lived for 25 years in Canada, or someone who claims to be a christian from Syria?

If your answer is the latter then it is you who isnt excercising good judgement.

Im fine with banning all syrian refugees but trying to ban only muslim refugees, and allowing in "So called" Christian refugees would simply create another hole where extremists are going to take advantage of the loophole.

Id far rather have a Canadian Muslim immigrant than a syrian christian immigrant, and if you cant see why, then you arent paying attention.

We don't "need" Muslim immigrants at all, so we should not be required to decipher and determine "which ones".... not a matter of "Syrian" or "Canadian"... Christian or otherwise.

America is not "obliged" to take in any refugees/invaders (and to socially support however many of them for the rest of their lives), regardless of their declared religion.
 
Last edited:
Yeah but we dont need syrian christian refugees either, so why even go there? Why give them another reason to target us? Ban them all and atleast its not a talking point that we are simply banning muslims, and feeding them more fuel for their fire.

Its an idiotic idea since we have no way to realistically vet the refugees religion anyways.

You going to take the "christian" refugees word for it?

We don't "need" Muslim immigrants at all, so we should not be required to decipher and determine "which ones".... not a matter of "Syrian" or "Canadian"... Christian or otherwise.

America is not "obliged" to take in any refugees/invaders, regardless of their declared religion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: d08
First off, this mess is partly or mostly because US went on a series of pretty much random wars. It's good to start shit and then complain when it backfires I guess. Overthrowing governments, killing people from the air is all fun and games until you realize the whole region has been destabilized to the point that it's hard to control.

You talk like an average NASCAR-watching-beer-chugging guy, throwing out emotional statements without thinking ahead. If you're also trading with real cash then that's pretty scary.

All Europeans are the same, correct?
I was against this uncontrolled mass immigration from the start, so you can take your false assumptions and stick them you know where.
You also assume I care about the feelings of Muslims, I don't.
It's really odd how people like you like to label others without knowing even one thing about their convictions.

Extremely simple logic says that if you start excluding all Muslims or people from Muslim countries, they will find ways to get citizenship or fake passports in other countries and then go to US below the radar, so to speak, then catching them would be much harder.
Muslims and Isis already have open access to America via the unprotected southern border. No need to buy fake passports and shave the beard. That we should allow them entry so we don't force them underground is a false choice. Secure the border then stem the flow. Nothing is perfect but well enjoy a great reduction in Muslim migration into America.

As for NATO in the Middle East, two wrongs don't make a right. Yes the Anglophiles fucked around over there since ww1 with great cost. But that doesn't mean we owe it to Muslims and Isis to bend over and let them have their way over here. That's called white guilt. The people who are guilty for those acts are not us. We have to protect ourselves.

And glad to hear ur against mass refugee migration. Were all in this together.

We've been PC for so long that barring traveling Muslims smacks like gas chambers. That's how far down. The rabbit hole we are.
 
Cessation of all immigration from all predominantly muslim countries is just a mild first step.

If CONUS attacks were to scale up significantly you are going to see detention of muslim US citizens and non-citizens and internment in remote camps like what occurred with the japanese.

Yep, many hundred thousands of people are going to internment camps. One or two more large scale attacks and its a done deal.
 
For the legitimate Syrian Christian refugees, sorry, but you guys get fucked for the same reason the Syrian muslim refugees do, there is simply no way to vet them.

A Wahibist Muslim (who we are at war with) will not utter the phrase "Jesus Christ is the Son of God". Nor will they identify themselves as Christian, it's heresy to them and their beliefs. A very easy simple and tried way to initially vet. But oh! We can't use it.......

As Far as Trump and his policies? All I see is Lefties and RINO's shitting themselves.
 
qyxgp76.jpg
 
Progressive Saint, Jimmy Carter, Banned Iranians From Entering America

by BigFurHat - December 8, 2015 - 6 Comments

FRONT PAGE –

During the Iranian hostage crisis, Carter issued a number of orders to put pressure on Iran. Among these, Iranians

were banned from entering

the United States unless they oppose the Shiite Islamist regime or had a medical emergency.

=========



Awesome when a democrat does it. Terrible when a republican does it. Especially Trump.

A temporary entry ban on Muslims, is basically Kristallnacht to Liberals.

Open borders and ISIS Jihadis flooding into America is not an outrage. It's not even a concern. Sure some Americans get shot up in the street or a building falls down on their head. Small price to pay for being "progressive".... A progressive corpse I like to say.
 
Back
Top