Trendfollowers: When oh when are we going to start making some $$$?

Quote from ProfLogic:

More mindless drivel from ET's resident Charlatan.
Man you're so full of shit, I bet you use bog-rolls to wipe your claptrap.

You're a pathological liar, plain and simple, you moron.
ET's biggest fake. Rip off any more farmers recently?

Nobel prize, ROFLMAO !!! :D :D :D
Here is that gem again for all to see:
http://www.tssupport.com/forum/view...previous&sid=8f9a94cbe338cf82d9ecdf33568feecf
"As we have already said, Bill Schamp is incompetent. Let me explain why.

Bill Schamp absolutely seriously claims that he once almost became a Nobel Prize winner. He also proclaimed himself a professor of logic and a software developer. All at the same time.
Obviously, this can’t be true, but Bill has his own peculiar perception of reality. Therefore, he cannot objectively assess the situation and our arguments don’t mean anything to him. Apart from that, Bill misrepresents facts as is typical of him."


Why is it that when I hear "FrothLogic" I think of the words "Pathological Liar, Charlatan, Clown, Fraud, Crook, BS artist..."? I wonder? :D
 
Quote from asiaprop:

out of curiosity, why is that? Whether someone gets banned or not lies at the complete discretion of the mods? How come there are tons of people who sell utter bullshxx and scam newcomers and nothing is done about that?
very strange isn't it? A while back one of Frothy's bum-chums was caught - as a mod - red-handed changing (not just deleting) posts. He was phuqued off post haste. It sure helps with the BS and the multiple aliases (i.e., Swine Flu posting to the defend Frothy).
 
buddy, thanks for the offer and your kind comparison, but I worked really long enough in this industry, professionally and working my own accounts, to clearly tell that your trading related posts are utter bs and are a testimony to your complete lack of understanding of how markets really operate. On my ignore list, which is rather rare. I seriously wished people of your caliber will even be banned from accessing the internet in the future.

Quote from ProfLogic:

Smart statement.
Now if I could get you to hold your opinion to what you are experienced with, we might actually agree.

I feel like asking my son to taste something he's NEVER tried and his response is . . . I don't like the way it tastes. He's really saying he doesn't like the look of it which is normal. After he tastes (trys) it usually he is a fan from that point on.

A lot of concepts are hard to digest in the beginnning. If you test it and it doesn't work then and only then will you know for sure.
 
Quote from Ash1972:

I'm definitely a trend follower. It's important to realise that weak, choppy trends are rarely profitable for trend following systems because of the open position management algorithms that get you out of the trend if it starts to reverse. They can lead to a lot of stops being hit in a row.

We tend to like trends that a fairly straight up or down :)


I wonder if factoring the VIX into your algos would help?

IE - lower VIX = longer trends, higher VIX = shorter trends.

This is what I do. Higher volatlility means I set lower targets and shorter time periods.
 
Quote from asiaprop:

buddy, thanks for the offer and your kind comparison, but I worked really long enough in this industry, professionally and working my own accounts, to clearly tell that your trading related posts are utter bs and are a testimony to your complete lack of understanding of how markets really operate. On my ignore list, which is rather rare. I seriously wished people of your caliber will even be banned from accessing the internet in the future.

If ignorance and a closed mind is bliss you are one of the happiest campers out there.

Nothing I talk about is something that can't be validated with a physics book, a logic book and a few hours of visual work.
Funny you want appreciation for your work in the industry but my 15 years is worthless yet you have no clue what I do . . . absolutely typical.
Can I ask what your educational level is?
 
Quote from Equalizer:

very strange isn't it? A while back one of Frothy's bum-chums was caught - as a mod - red-handed changing (not just deleting) posts. He was phuqued off post haste. It sure helps with the BS and the multiple aliases (i.e., Swine Flu posting to the defend Frothy).

Your reference is funny. Please do tell who that was.
Your butt buddy was just banned toothless.
 
Quote from Equalizer:

Man you're so full of shit, I bet you use bog-rolls to wipe your claptrap.
You're a pathological liar, plain and simple, you moron.
ET's biggest fake. Rip off any more farmers recently?
Nobel prize, ROFLMAO !!! :D :D :D
Here is that gem again for all to see:
http://www.tssupport.com/forum/view...previous&sid=8f9a94cbe338cf82d9ecdf33568feecf
"As we have already said, Bill Schamp is incompetent. Let me expain why.
Bill Schamp absolutely seriously claims that he once almost became a Nobel Prize winner. He also proclaimed himself a professor of logic and a software developer. All at the same time.
Obviously, this can’t be true, but Bill has his own peculiar perception of reality. Therefore, he cannot objectively assess the situation and our arguments don’t mean anything to him. Apart from that, Bill misrepresents facts as is typical of him."

Why is it that when I hear "FrothLogic" I think of the words "Pathological Liar, Charlatan, Clown, Fraud, Crook, BS artist..."? I wonder? :D

What is so hilariously funny is that if you read the entire link Equaltoothlessizer posted you will understand the problem was a data issue. The reason the owner, Dennis Globa later apologized was that the EXACT problem they denied was what they fixed and solved the problem. Marina called me incompetent and it was the problem I pointed out to them that eventually solved the issue. It was a cache error.

I was a logic professor both in the continuing education department of Ohio State and corporately.

I currently still tinker at being software developer and hold a Master degree and hopefully I can find time to finish the PhD.

I never said I was "almost" a Nobel Prize" winner. My research was evaluated and submitted in 2006 by an economic group in Zürich. Far stretch from the statement made but for idiots like toothless, idiot that can't trade, it means the same.

If anyone qualifies as a pathological liar, plain and simple, its you.
ET's biggest fabricator.

Oh, farmers come to my home on a regular basis to watch the markets butt munch. We farmers own guns. If someone does us a disservice they don't come too awful close to our homes. Of course this kind of community closeness is alien to the like of you.

Wanna trade heads up sometime liar?
 
Quote from ProfLogic:

...more crap from FrothLogic, ET's Charlatan #1
I haven't laughed so much in long time. Once again ET does not fail to disappoint.

Logic professor? LOL. Masters and PhD? Can you name the University(ies), I bet not on this planet - Uranus maybe. How about topic of research and professors. LMAO
Almost a Nobel winner? Hee hee hee.... ahh, that's just too funny. Can you name the group? Was it AA in Zurich? :D Publish any papers in respected journals? Nah, I didn't think so. Next time take your medication before posting old man.

Liar liar pants...

You're a cook. There's nothing wrong with that. You gotta cut the Bullshit, seriously, you're sloshing in it. Clearly you reckon all this BS impresses the poor noobs. Phuckwitt.

Still love this quote from TSSupport:
As we have already said, Bill Schamp is incompetent. Let me expain why.
Bill Schamp absolutely seriously claims that he once almost became a Nobel Prize winner. He also proclaimed himself a professor of logic and a software developer. All at the same time.
Obviously, this can’t be true, but Bill has his own peculiar perception of reality. Therefore, he cannot objectively assess the situation and our arguments don’t mean anything to him. Apart from that, Bill misrepresents facts as is typical of him."


You initials are BS. How appropriate!

Why is it that when I hear "FrothLogic" I think of the words "Pathological Liar, Charlatan, Clown, Fraud, Crook, BS artist..."? I wonder?
 
Quote from jack hershey:

mizhael and southall are posting from an inductive orientation. On the other hand proflogic is speaking from a reasoning point of view.

Until a trader or designer makes the shift from induction to deduction, he gets the consequences of non performance.

Those using induction are NOT using the two market variables. they are getting the consequences as they sate to us in thier posts. they have questions also. These questions originate as a consequence of not using more than one market variable.


Okay, as I am worried about the market tomorrow (the market seems to be moving into a (temporarily?) bull sentiment, while my system is still net short at this moment), I am re-reading your post, and got confused.

What "more than one market variable" shall we use?


A shown by some posts, the systems of some people are not neutrally biased. As you see proflogic's system is neutrally biased. there is a definite requirement to be neutrally biased and to define all system components from a neutrally biased viewpoint.

Do you mean market neutrality? What do you mean?
 
Back
Top