Here's another observation:
At too large of a timeline, trend lines become meaningless. Can you honestly draw any conclusions from this AUD/USD graph of last 20 years?
what meaning are you attaching to a trend?I'm stuck on wondering if any of these trends are actually real in the first place. And if any positive results would just be false positives.
is any thing real in any business.I'm stuck on wondering if any of these trends are actually real in the first place. And if any positive results would just be false positives.
is any thing real in any business.
is anything certain in any business
millions use TA.
95% lose but 5% win.
what does that tell you.what does that mean?
that 95% do not know how to use it.
it is apparent that you are one of those 95% who do not know how to use.
nothing to be ashamed of.
but that does not mean TA is mumbo jumbo that is a servant to only 5% of traders
Not interesting, and probably not relevant. Are you a professor at a liberal university?Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle says that the more precisely you measure somethings location, the less precisely you can measure it's velocity/momentum, etc.
Similarly, the more you zoom in on a chart, the less meaningful the trend lines are. On a tick chart, they're all but meaningless. You could "see" a clear trend on a 5-minute chart, only to zoom out to a week and see it as meaningless.
Now if you zoom out on a macro- scale, you can clearly see that the planet Saturn is moving at a certain speed and will continue to do so unless an outside force is applied (FA).
Thoughts?

Not interesting, and probably not relevant. Are you a professor at a liberal university?![]()