Trend Following
Sponsor
If anyone listens to this man they deserve to lose every last penny in their possession.
Quote from jack hershey:
It is very important to recognize the mistakes in Seykota's statement.
The main clues are found in the Behavioral Finance piece just below the Introduction on the home page of Behavioral Finance.
It is really important to NOT do trend following and do trend monitoring and Analysis. It this effort, time is NOt the independent variable. What IS the independent variable is "events". Of the two classes, one has duration in terms of time; the other does not.
Events form trends. Events follow a specific invariant order of events.
Thus, through trend monitoring and analysis you know three things:
1. What is happening in the Present;
2. What is next in the order of events; and
3. How fast (in time) events are changing.
I don't care about others views nor judge those people because I practice trend monitoring and analysis well beyond the limits of the belief systems of any on ET (vendors, like Covel or retailers). Trend following never was my practice; my orientation is extracting the market's offer.
When the event named "continuing" is going on (measurably) I hold to take the full offer from the market; when the event named "change" has its brief moment (measurably), I reverse to be on the correct side of the market's upcoming "continuing". All events has prescribed pre and post measurable characteristics.
Hence I espouse a pattern: B2B 2R 2B for long profit segments and R2R 2B 2R for short profit segments.
Covel correctly calls this "gibberish" and he calls Seykota precise, etc. because he has a permanent problem. I do not have Covel's or others' problem(s).
Trend following "research" is a mistaken quest.
As I have said before, I have no interest in whether a person likes me or my chosen trading persuasion. What I do proves Seykota and Covel and others with like views are incorrect in their views.