Quote from Trend Following:
Why does it matter what causes a trend?
And how can you objectively test the effectiveness of this intuitive method? You can't.Quote from ArbitRAGE:
Identifying the cause of a trend can help a trade intuitively assess the sustainability of the trend.
Quote from SnakeEYE:
![]()
Are you serious?
How can you follow it then![]()
![]()
![]()
Quote from Butterball:
Systematic, mechanic trend-followers intentionally disregard reasons and causes for a price breakout and simply bet on that it will continue in the initial direction. They'll be wrong often, for a small loss. And every once in a while they hit a home run.
Quote from kut2k2:
Most of TA is about following trends without having a clue what causes them. Measuring something and understanding what causes it are two different things.
Quote from Butterball:
And how can you objectively test the effectiveness of this intuitive method? You can't.
Systematic, mechanic trend-followers intentionally disregard reasons and causes for a price breakout and simply bet on that it will continue in the initial direction. They'll be wrong often, for a small loss. And every once in a while they hit a home run.
Quote from Butterball:
And how can you objectively test the effectiveness of this intuitive method? You can't.
Quote from slavduja:
You can create a macro model or do a top down apporach.
Quote from Trend Following:
Not sure what that means...
You can't test, prove or disprove 'intuitive' whatever. It can change with the blowing wind...
Quote from slavduja:
With all due respect Mr. Covel...
Trend following works as proven by many, but so do many other things. Soros has outperformed all trend followers and that's just one example.
Do they trade intuitively, possibly, but they sure know their fundamentals and macroeconomics.