Cool.
Edit : BTW, what is JWH? (Not John W. Henry?)
Edit : BTW, what is JWH? (Not John W. Henry?)
Quote from hank rollins:
yes, you are missing my methodology. my journal, by the way, has been continued on my new site which i am not permitted by ET's guidelines to mention. my entry figures are based on time/price junctures and not past price. hope this makes sense.
![]()

Quote from Thunderdog:
Actually, I'm not quite sure that I follow. Although I am not a Gann proponent or even a neoGann proponent as you are (or even a post neo modern Gann aficionado, for that matter), it seems to me that you are forecasting price on the basis of past price, even if that past price happens to be one minute old one minute from now. It may appear to be different in form, but is it really different in substance insofar as price forecasting is concerned? After all, you are still making price projections and you are using price as a starting point (albeit in conjunction with time in some configuration or other). With that in mind, should people living in price/time continuums really be throwing Gann wheels?
[/QUOTE
yes, its very different. the simplistic HH, HL etc formulations with multi targets, as illustrated in proflogics journal, of the naive' trend followers are radically different than my index system. my system provides an exact entry point both short and long plus the channel where one remains flat. the 2 entry points are determined by the juncture of price and time--- ( gann was the original thinker behind this idea, but i am in no way a gann trader)
Quote from hank rollins:
. my system provides an exact entry point both short and long plus the channel where one remains flat. the 2 entry points are determined by the juncture of price and time--- ( gann was the original thinker behind this idea, but i am in no way a gann trader)