trend following delusion shattered

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from ProfLogic:

Asked . . . answered . . . ignored. Now you start to whine too? I'm impressed.
More...


all honesty, prof, is your system a trend system ? from my quick perusal it appears to be a channel system of some type, based on retracements and reversions.
no ??
 
Quote from TSGannGalt:

In what terms are you talking about, to conclude that it works?

:D
More...

it made decent profits over a 5 yr period max Drawdown was under 30% and sharpe ratio was about 1.5. Better than 90% of traders out there
 
Quote from NickelScalper:

That hostile attitude must be getting monotonous.

Why don't you mix it up a little?
More...

You are taking this as hostile . . . no wonder rational thought is hard for you to grasp. I'm only feeding to you what you are feeding to this thread . . .
 
Quote from hank rollins:

all honesty, prof, is your system a trend system ? from my quick perusal it appears to be a channel system of some type, based on retracements and reversions.
no ??
More...


LOL.....
 
honestly, if they think that a trend following system can't produce profit, then good for them.

being close minded is a precursor to failure
 
Quote from hank rollins:

all honesty, prof, is your system a trend system ? from my quick perusal it appears to be a channel system of some type, based on retracements and reversions.
no ??
More...

No, it is strickly the reading of trends.

Hank, you really don't understand. Your opinion doesn't matter. Nickel's opinion doesn't matter. And for that matter my opinion doesn't matter. But facts speak for themselves. You are a statistician and anyone with a math background knows what that allows you . . . a license to manipulate results under the guise of science. What I do is OBJECTIVE what you do is SUBJECTIVE. There is no candy coating either side of that debate as much as you try.

Statisticians hate being boxed objectively and you are no different than any one in your field . . . which is a real shame. Safer to fall in line then to reach out and experience new things.
 
Quote from hank rollins:

no offense meant...... just seeking an opinion from an actual known system trader, builder---ganngalt or whatever his name is this week.

:)
More...

:eek:

Well, I did have other aliases but they've all been banned... :D

I only have one alias that I use and can use... right now... (unless this alias gets banned again... in that case... I'm sure it'll resemble my old names... :D )

... I'll be honest... I have another alias... it's "nitro" ... LOL... j/k
 
Quote from TSGannGalt:

:eek:

Well, I did have other aliases but they've all been banned... :D

I only have one alias that I use and can use... right now... (unless this alias gets banned again... in that case... I'm sure it'll resemble my old names... :D )

... I'll be honest... I have another alias... it's "nitro" ... LOL... j/k
More...



whose the greatest quasi gann trader on the face of the earth ??


bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha


goodnight !
 
Quote from ProfLogic:

No, it is strickly the reading of trends.

Hank, you really don't understand. Your opinion doesn't matter. Nickel's opinion doesn't matter. And for that matter my opinion doesn't matter. But facts speak for themselves. You are a statistician and anyone with a math background knows what that allows you . . . a license to manipulate results under the guise of science. What I do is OBJECTIVE what you do is SUBJECTIVE. There is no candy coating either side of that debate as much as you try.

Statisticians hate being boxed objectively and you are no different than any one in your field . . . which is a real shame. Safer to fall in line then to reach out and experience new things.
More...


ok, prof. i tried to be nice, now go back to your little school and delusional world of holy grails.

:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top