trend following delusion shattered

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from marketsurfer:

I doubt the first statement, but have no data to back it up.


you sure that money did not come from from FEES?


surf

:D

Well, he didn't buy the Sox with the 2% mgmt fee...
 
An absolute fact... no question about it: John Henry's funds have made billions of dollars in profits for clients thru the years. Trend traders who hold positions for months = years do not concern themselves with relatively short-term performance as per this thread measures. A down year or two is irrelevant when their 20-year track record speaks for itself.

Speaking as a pure intraday emini trader (at this time) I will also add that the act of following trends intraday, be they hours or minutes in duration is where the biggest money is, by a country mile.

Hope this helps :>)
Austin
 
Are you still supporting those "speculators" who joined your site, went to seminars, etc.? Just an honest question, not trying to pick a fight or anything...


Quote from ProfLogic:

I've since had a change of heart over the last year where speculators are concerned and have decided to sit back and just trade what you say can't work and teach the occasional university based ag-marketing class to individuals that KNOW trends exist. Try to tell a family or professional farmer or rancher that trends or seasonality don't exist and you would be laughed out of a room.

Everyone that EVER said that there is, "More money in trading than teaching IF the method is successful", was absolutely correct. When one trades successfully then the teaching one does on top of that trading is solely for the soul. [/B]
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

in the interest of full transparency and to answer mr. steve's querry, and to correct his misstatements of facts---- the marketsurfer alias was banned from elite due to competitive concerns of this sites management, therefore "hank rollins" entered the fray. marketsurfer has been restored to being an active alias, therefore, hank rollins has been retired.


nothing more, nothing less..... the conspiracy ideas are fascinating, keep em coming!

and yes, there is some truth to your idea of WHY i continue this conversation..... however, i have not "blown out".

surf:D :p

Well surely there is an audited record of your "fund's" performance? Or your personal trading performance. After all, you have been asking everyone here to provide data. Where is your's? I am sure we would all love to see confirmation of what you have just claimed.

Steve
 
Quote from MKTrader:

Are you still supporting those "speculators" who joined your site, went to seminars, etc.? Just an honest question, not trying to pick a fight or anything...

MK,

I am one of the Prof's students and YES, he is still supporting us.

Best,

Curious1
 
Quote from Buy1Sell2:

Agreed, that's why you stay with a trade until the reaction low or high is taken out. That is trend following. Reaction highs and lows are not taken out as a rule in any market unless the market is reversing or stopping the trend.

ok - now i see what you meant. but what if you enter in the direction of the (past) trend - after a pullback (reaction low) - are the odds of the market going (further) in your direction any higher than at any other point? or what if the reaction low is taken out but nevertheless few minutes later the trend resumes?
 
Quote from gerry875:

ok - now i see what you meant. but what if you enter in the direction of the (past) trend - after a pullback (reaction low) - are the odds of the market going (further) in your direction any higher than at any other point? or what if the reaction low is taken out but nevertheless few minutes later the trend resumes?

If the trend is in it's infancy , yes. However, you should already be in and the reaction low/high becomes a place to place stops or reversal trades. You place the stop or reversal outside of the reaction low/high a predetermined distance. As far as the second question, you'll find that the reaction low/high is seldom taken out without a reversal or a cessation of the current trend. That is the essence of trend following. If you would like to see an example of what I am speaking about, take a gander at the 60 minute British Pound futures chart over the past couple of days until right now.
 
Quote from MKTrader:

Are you still supporting those "speculators" who joined your site, went to seminars, etc.? Just an honest question, not trying to pick a fight or anything...

Absolutely, it's my responsibility.
 
Quote from austinp:

An absolute fact... no question about it: John Henry's funds have made billions of dollars in profits for clients thru the years. Trend traders who hold positions for months = years do not concern themselves with relatively short-term performance as per this thread measures. A down year or two is irrelevant when their 20-year track record speaks for itself.

Speaking as a pure intraday emini trader (at this time) I will also add that the act of following trends intraday, be they hours or minutes in duration is where the biggest money is, by a country mile.

Hope this helps :>)
Austin


this seems self contradictory.

JWH has made billions, for his clients, long term, but the biggest money is intraday by a country mile?? what am i missing???

surf
 
Surf, I spoke in two completely different context of topics

#1: John Henry has made billions from trend trading

#2: apart and away from position trading like Henry and others, intraday trading as many of us prefer is likewise most profitable when traders ride the directional swings rather than attempts to "scalp" the wiggles and blips counter to those short-term intraday trends.

One example had nothing to do with the other, sorry about that confusion :>)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top