Trayvon Martin Video Shows No Blood or Bruises on George Zimmerman

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

I think most of this obsessive focus on Zimmerman, his injuries or lack thereof, if he was on conrete or not, what the girlfriend overheard or didn't, should Zimmerman have followed Martin, etc is legally irrelevant.

I don't even see the stand your ground law as being relevant, as Zimmerman apparently said he was attacked without warning. Reduced to essentials, this is a case where two guys were fighting and one shot the other. If Zimmerman had a reasonable belief that he would otherwise have suffered death or serious harm, then he has a valid self defense claim. If not, he has committed probably manslaughter. It is unclear to me what the legal significance would be if Zimmerman was somehow shown to have thrown the first punch, other than to make him guilty of an assault.

The only witnesses have said at least that they say Martin on top of Zimmerman, punching him and that Zimmerman was calling for help. Zimmerman had some injuries, while martin apparently had none, other than of course a gunshot wound. Zimmerman's father gave an interview in which he said Zimmerman had left his vehicle to go around tothe front of the townhouses to get a street address for the police and was attacked on his return.

Viewed objectively, it seems to me that actual relevant facts tend to corroborate Zimmerman's account. The story has been muddied by the wild allegations made by various race hustlers to the effect that Martin was stalked, hunted down and executed, which clearly did not happen. There is a crucial gap when the fight began, but again it seems to me that Zimmerman's account is more credible. Typically, guys packing a firearm do not instigate fistfights. Nor do they call the police to announce they are following a suspect before jumping him.


The thing that bothers me about this case is I know to a moral certainty that if Zimmerman was a police officer, he would never be charged on these facts. This kind of officer attacked shooting occurs regularly and is never labelled manslaughter. In fact, there are frequent cases where police shoot people who they claimed tried to run over them with a car. A car that misses you is far less of a threat than someone mounting you and trying to grab your gun. Legally, Zimmerman has as much right to defend himself as a policeman. Whether that will turn out to be true politically may be another matter.

That's pretty close to my view on it as well...

However, the story keeps changing and facts get twisted around so I don't really believe in either side of the argument anymore. Needless to say if the facts are as they stand depending on the severity of the threat to Zimmerman then Zimmerman should go free... If it turns out that no one was bashing his head into the ground, concrete, pavement, grass, lawn or whatever the main argument in self-defense and "fearing for his life"... goes out the window for him. That's about it...
 
Quote from CoolTraderDude:

That's pretty close to my view on it as well...

However, the story keeps changing and facts get twisted around so I don't really believe in either side of the argument anymore. Needless to say if the facts are as they stand depending on the severity of the threat to Zimmerman then Zimmerman should go free... If it turns out that no one was bashing his head into the ground, concrete, pavement, grass, lawn or whatever the main argument in self-defense and "fearing for his life"... goes out the window for him. That's about it...

+1

There should be multiple witnesses to Zimmerman's injuries. Police, the medics who treated him on the scene, and the hospital he said he went to the next day. That would pretty much place it into the self-defense category.

If those accounts do not line-up, he has problems.

The part about getting out of his car to go around and get a street address sounds odd. Didn't Zimmerman live in the area? If he had been "patrolling" previously, you'd think he would be familiar with the streets. Also, would he have to get close enough to Martin to get an address? A block can be pretty long, and you don't even need to get out of your car. In fact, being in a car would get you to a street crosswalk with street signs even faster. "I'm at the corner of X & Y - suspect is proceeding Northbound on X."

I've seen some reports that Zimmerman said he wanted to work in law enforcement. Why didn't he just take the exam and do it? Without a badge, he's just a guy with a gun on the street following people he thinks are suspicious.
 
Quote from MarketMasher:

[BI've seen some reports that Zimmerman said he wanted to work in law enforcement. Why didn't he just take the exam and do it? Without a badge, he's just a guy with a gun on the street following people he thinks are suspicious. [/B]

According to previous articles, if you had a previous arrest for misdemeanor assault charges in Florida then you are not eligible for law enforcement or teaching positions in the state, even if the charges were handled via a pre-trial diversion program for first time offenders. Zimmerman would be eligible for a a law enforcement job in other states however that do not have this requirement about misdemeanor assault charges that do not go to trial.
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

I don't even see the stand your ground law as being relevant, as Zimmerman apparently said he was attacked without warning.

Attacked without warning??? Zimmerman admitted there was a verbal confrontation before he claims that Martin punched him in the face. Trayvon Martin did not just jump out of the bushes and punch Zimmerman as evidenced by Zimmerman's own words.

Also the phone call with Martin's girlfriend confirms a verbal confrontation took place first. Even though the words overheard in her account disagree with what was said in Zimmerman's accounting.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

According to previous articles, if you had a previous arrest for misdemeanor assault charges in Florida then you are not eligible for law enforcement or teaching positions in the state, even if the charges were handled via a pre-trial diversion program for first time offenders. Zimmerman would be eligible for a a law enforcement job in other states however that do not have this requirement about misdemeanor assault charges that do not go to trial.

Well, then he's just a guy with a gun on the street following people he thinks are suspicious.

I'm not in the camp that paints Martin as a choir boy - didn't know him at all, and he appears to have had his run-ins with school administration. Though, that would include a lot of teens...

But whenever there is a shooting involving plain-clothes police, a critical fact is "When did you identify yourself as law-enforcement?"

Because AFTER you identify, it is resisting arrest. BEFORE you identify, it is trying to get away from a guy on the street with a gun.
 
Just to sum up what an objective observer would actually see here:

1 - A totally utterly and completely botched police investigation.
2 - No evidence at all of a struggle, as in:

a) no scratches or bruises of any sort on Martin's hands.
b) no blood on Zimmerman's shirt or jacket. Remember, he was supposed to have shot him while he was on top of him. Presumably, simple gravity would put blood on him. That same force would have landed Trayvon on top of him. And yet, no blood. Anywhere on him. How....odd.
c) no evidence of bleeding from the nose or the back of the head.
d) no puke: if the Cool one is correct, he had enough self-control, it would seem, not to puke from getting dizzy.

Remember, the shooting was at around 7:15, the video at around 7:50. 35 minutes, more or less, from time of incident to time of the video. And yet he walks around the way I would to go out and get the mail (except for being cuffed, of course). Doesn't look at all shook up, no limps, no flinching from contact to any place that would be tender from getting hit, clothes have no blood on them, from Trayvon or from himself.
Also, no emotion. If I had just shot someone a half hour ago, I'd still be shaking like a leaf. This guy? Nothing.
So, an objective observer would conclude that if there was a struggle, it was brief and had no physical effect whatever on Mr. Zimmerman. That same observer would have to conclude, from the lack of any blood anywhere on him, that Trayvon was shot at enough of a distance to prevent any from getting on him, and that that would be simply impossible if Trayvon were actually on top of him at the time the shot went off.
Not just hard, impossible. As in violating the laws of physics.
So, if Trayvon wasn't

a) on top of him, and
b) close enough to Zimmerman to get blood on Zimmerman when he was shot,

just where was Trayvon in relation to Zimmerman when he was shot? Someone needs to answer this one.
 
Quote from denner:

+1.

Most members of this forum have reached the same conclusion.

Thunderpussy/Gayfly1/brASS is as queer as they come.


He's proud to be a liberal, why isn't he proud of his "orientation"?
 
Quote from Brass:

"Flowery" as in grammatically correct and factually accurate? No, I imagine evolution and climate change deniers would not be impressed.

That reminds me, you misspelled obsessed earlier today.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Thunderpussy/Gayfly1/brASS is as queer as they come.


He's proud to be a liberal, why isn't he proud of his "orientation"?

So what if he's gay? WTF is wrong with you? What are you 15?
 
Back
Top