In all fairness, at first glance I thought they were using some type of bayesian data splines.
No malice.
But if you're going to be an ass, I'll just block you as well.
No ill will. I've tried to be polite, and cordial. No outbursts (
and yes, I saw the comment on "Didn't that guy slam Taleb for being so sensitive?"). More than willing to admit where I mess something up, and mis-state a fact. In fact, I think I may have been thinking of Blue Sigma. Of course, Blue Sigma may themselves be one of the
twenty thousand dead and liquidated CTA's in Barclay Hedge, because ones try to be firms that deny simple math. Honestly? I don't care if they are or not.
But in the end? I just don't care.
Make no mistake. It's not sensitivity. Taleb will have an outburst, and "F THIS AND F THAT AND F YOU YOU STUPID" "You're F'ing misquoting me you stupid F!!"
I won't go there. Because in all honesty?
I just don't care. That's anger, which Taleb seems to have in abundance. Anger takes energy. I'm more apathetic. I just don't care about you. And I just don't have any energy to care about douchebags. Is anyone going to care about them? Why should I? It's sorta like getting upset at a dog barking in the background. Why take the energy to care about it? Just shoot the damn thing and be done with it.
Spelling mistakes are from the fact I'm laying on my couch in my office, and just raising enough effort to text-to-speech. Screw typing it all out. And there are times why I'm wondering why I'm spending any time on that at all. Some of the new folks seem to learn a thing or two.
And this is all besides the point?
That again, it is 8 posts, about a side hi-jack, that has nothing to do with the original post, and is obsessing over a side comment I made. Which in a way? I'm sort of thankful for ... because it teaches me that yeah ... Global Sigma's day will come as well. Just a matter of math. So I needn't watch them any longer.
I mean ... think about that honestly. For just a moment.
Some jackass, has to OBSESS over a side comment and observation about, that has nothing to do with the point at hand ... that in the end, I don't care about anyway ... and may have been over a mistaken view I had? I mean ... what sort of loser is that? How pathetic do you have to be, to make that your aim?
Regardless, literally taking a side observation of mine, away from the main point, not addressing ANY of the objections I made (
Name me 20 Alternative Firms over 5 Billion. Or even 5). Nah, can't respond to that. Just have to keep harping on a stupid side point and side observation; which in the end, I could care less about anyway.
It's no wonder the public at large is in the state it's in. I mean ... lord ... Look at yourself. LOL. Can't even object on a factual point to High School mathematics on probability and statistics. You just have to make asinine comments about it; because obviously your education didn't include Bayesian Decision Probabilities (
yikes).
Usually born of people that haven't done much, and they have to try to attack something, so they attack an "i" that isn't dotted. So they take a side observation, and turn it into a crusade. Like I said ... look at the public at large.
I believe in the fractal nature of the universe.
Fractured and splintering societies are made of fractured and splintered individuals.