Quick update.
A & B - Two SL's going into today, shallow and steep.
C - DL.
D - Solid break below the DL... lets wait for a RET.
E - Poke below the OL, but is quickly bought up. Buying above this bar, the bar that rejects an OH or OL really needs to be explored.
F - First RET for a long, but not one I take because the RET doesn't happen above the SL. To the left is so much activity, so we are right in the middle of this range. On the plus side, the swing low at G is above the 50% of this up move, so if a trend starts, I can always buy the next RET that clears this range.
G - For testing purposes, here would be the stop for the long at F. I have been seeing far too many slight penetrations of the stop by a few ticks, which would stop me out, only to have price go back above. So I think the trick is to wait for the next bar after the penetration and not have an automatic stop loss just below the swing low. (the automatic stop loss might be a disaster stop 10 points away... which is only $200 on 1 contract anyway, so not quite a disaster, but something that would prevent financial ruin in case of technical problems)
H - We stop just short of the shallow SL before turning down. The long does not reach 1:1.
J - We do ultimately break below that swing low at G, so if the long at F was taken with the intent of reaching at least a 1:1 profit, this trade doesn't work. But like I said, it didn't set up properly and this is where context really comes in.
K - Although this can be considered to be a RET, the bars with the same height, in my testing I saw these fail more often than the better type of RET which has a crest/trough. This RET does happen above the SL which is good, but its just not the right type of RET and I'm not liking the context. I would only use this type of RET as a reason to get into a strongly trending market where you just have to get in somewhere, but this is not what we have today.
L - So here we break the previous swing low which I could have used as a stop for the long at K if taken, and hence this trade would be a loss as well.
SUMMARY
So no trades today. I find it interesting that we have nicely bounced off the overnight levels. I tried to build a plan around this months ago, but didn't get far because I saw it didn't work often enough. Given the context of today, the huge drop yesterday and the sideways overnight action, a trading range type of day makes sense. Taking REV trades at the overnight levels would have worked very well. At the time, I just didn't understand enough about testing a method that had positive expectancy with clear ideas of where stops should be. Perhaps if I dug into it now again, I could really come up with something good.
The fact that after a down move, there is no RET for an entry to continue with the trend is sometimes a good sign that price will be moving in the opposite direction, so having this in the back of your head and building a trading plan around it can be profitable, especially when this happens at a level you're watching. This is after all the first trade that I took yesterday, the short that bounced off the OH, but I didn't take it today because of the context.