Quote from stu:
You are the one missing the point. You could actually confirm in practical ways other than word of mouth and what's written in far more compelling form than any fable , that children are starving.
You could not prove in any way other than word of mouth or in practical ways that your imaginary friend "the higher power out there" was anything but a fable.
It's knowing that those differences are possible to confirm but ignoring them for the sake of a pious belief, and encouraging a dishonest misrepresention which makes the belief as well as the argument, in my view, contemptuous.
And you make the ASSUMPTION that I believe in GOD, time for you to go back and retake introduction to logic.