Traders misinterpret a Comey video that they think clears Trump

But the anonymous sources in the Trump stories were confirmed too - Comey memos exist as reported and classified info was leaked.

As for 'Deep State' vs Trump, was Deep State against Hillary for leaking all the email shit all through the election cycle?
Neither the NYT reporter nor the source have the memo. According to the reporter that wrote the story regarding Comey memo, the source recounted a memo that the source had seen to the reporter. Obviously, we are all aware that human memory is perfect. Just ask a court of law.

[/QUOTE]
 
Yeah, why would the source have the memo?

Because they are government records, they are not supposed to be just handed over.

You didn't answer my question, Fox News confirmed they exist - are they lying too?
 
Come on, Todd. We don't need no stinkin' memos. Who cares if the memo has any pertinent information, or whether it was just a recipe for Veal Piccata? What's really important is what we think it said.

Yup, just like that Zero Hedge story you posted, so much pertinent information which turned out to be complete fabrication. LMFAO!
 
Yup, just like that Zero Hedge story you posted, so much pertinent information which turned out to be complete fabrication. LMFAO!

Glad you agree that the memo story is also a complete fabrication, "Just like the Zerohedge story". LMFAO!!
 
Now you know why most traders lose in the market

http://www.cnbc.com/id/104479038
Poor listening and analytical skills seem to be the rule rather than the exception. Of course the video does not clear Trump. But you'd have to carefully listen to both the question and the response to realize that, as opposed to uncritically accepting what you think you heard, or what the media tells you was heard.

Good for Kucinich, I always thought highly of him and his response in the posted video reinforces my respect for him. He's bright; well informed; a sharp thinker. He is not saying President Trump is not an asshole, a liar, and a criminal; he is not saying he is. He is expressing concern about an intelligence/military community that may have aspirations not in keeping with the best interests of ordinary citizens and an open, democratic society.

The business of Russian hackers trying to interfere with the election is, naturally, of interest. The topic is a reliable audience share builder for media. The investigation that is most likely going to lead to serious trouble for Trump and associates, however, is the investigation into real estate transactions involving Russian money, possible money laundering and tax evasion. This is an investigation going on in the background. I mentioned it some weeks ago. This money business doesn't yet have the media cachet of possible, Russian-Trump-campaign collusion, but were I Trump, it's the investigation I'd be most worried about. It is the probe far more likely to take him down, and potentially give him a several year, all expenses paid 'vacation'.

Trumps bizarre behavior in light of a highly unusual concentration among his advisors and administration of those with a history of Russian business dealings raises eyebrows. The Russians are well-known for corrupt business practice. The possibility that Trump himself has been involved in illicit financial activity is naturally heightened but such closeness and concentration of Russian, business connections. If Trump is involved in illicit business dealings, it is almost inconceivable that young Jared is not also entangled.

We are going to find out how artful our President's real estate deals really are. We already know that our President, aided by his narcissism, is a first rate 'showboater'. I think it quite likely that his affliction has also resulted in risky deal making with counter parties his mother would not approve of.
 
Last edited:
1. In short kucinich correct. the way the deep state is conducting business is a national security threat. But, you don't want to confirm that so you just dance around it. This is the critically important issue here as presidents only serve for limited periods of time.

2. You have a theory that Trump may have allowed Russians to bury money in real estate and this may or may not run afoul of laws such as anti money laundering statues. (this may be good speculation but its speculation and could be wrong or never proven.) A lot of West coast real estate was sold to people from china. They were obviously using real estate as a way to invest, to cash out of china and probably hide money from someone. You would suspect the same thing happened with Russians and Trump had the real estate to sell. I have seen no one accuse him of doing anything illegal. Do you have any facts?

3. We agree is cabinet picks did not match his campaign rhetoric and its hurting him with his base and the deep state. But... maybe not that much because his polling numbers seemed to have rebound sharply.

I think he will have just learned to pull an obama. Do photo ops give speeches and avoid the press when having issues.


Poor listening and analytical skills seem to be the rule rather than the exception. Of course the video does not clear Trump. But you'd have to carefully listen to both the question and the response to realize that, as opposed to uncritically accepting what you think you heard, or what the media tells you was heard.

Good for Kucinich, I always thought highly of him and his response in the posted video reinforces my respect for him. He's bright; well informed; a sharp thinker. He is not saying President Trump is not an asshole, a liar, and a criminal; he is not saying he is. He is expressing concern about an intelligence/military community that may have aspirations not in keeping with the best interests of ordinary citizens and an open, democratic society.

The business of Russian hackers trying to interfere with the election is, naturally, of interest. The topic is a reliable audience share builder for media. The investigation that is most likely going to lead to serious trouble for Trump and associates, however, is the investigation into real estate transactions involving Russian money, possible money laundering and tax evasion. This is an investigation going on in the background. I mentioned it some weeks ago. This money business doesn't yet have the media cachet of possible, Russian-Trump-campaign collusion, but were I Trump, it's the investigation I'd be most worried about. It is the probe far more likely to take him down, and potentially give him a several year, all expenses paid 'vacation'.

Trumps bizarre behavior in light of a highly unusual concentration among his advisors and administration of those with a history of Russian business dealings raises eyebrows. The Russians are well-known for corrupt business practice. The possibility that Trump himself has been involved in illicit financial activity is naturally heightened but such closeness and concentration of Russian, business connections. If Trump is involved in illicit business dealings, it is almost inconceivable that young Jared is not also entangled.

We are going to find out how artful our President's real estate deals really are. We already know that our President, aided by his narcissism, is a first rate 'showboater'. I think it quite likely that his affliction has also resulted in risky deal making with counter parties his mother would not approve of.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top