Trader Psychological Test: The Left Brain vs Right Brain

Which way do you see the dancer moving?

  • Counterclockwise (left brain dominant)

    Votes: 13 23.6%
  • Clockwise (right brain dominant)

    Votes: 42 76.4%

  • Total voters
    55
Read Hank Prudens book: The Three Skills Of Top Trading. There are several sections about using right AND left brain for optimal trading results.
 
Quote from jinxu:

I'm interested in knowing the psychological makeup of trader. Or at the very least the ones that are on Elitetrader. Here's a simple test for left/right brain dominant. There's no questions. All you got to do is look at a picture of a dancer spinning and it'll only take you a minute at most. Here's the link:

http://www.perthnow.com.au/fun-games/left-brain-vs-right-brain/story-e6frg46u-1111114517613

Here's also a list of the left brain and right brain functions.:

LEFT BRAIN FUNCTIONS
uses logic
detail oriented
facts rule
words and language
present and past
math and science
can comprehend
knowing
acknowledges
order/pattern perception
knows object name
reality based
forms strategies
practical
safe

RIGHT BRAIN FUNCTIONS
uses feeling
"big picture" oriented
imagination rules
symbols and images
present and future
philosophy & religion
can "get it" (i.e. meaning)
believes
appreciates
spatial perception
knows object function
fantasy based
presents possibilities
impetuous
risk taking

Which side do you think is more useful to trading? And Why?




The brain didn't even have a chance.

My dick counted 423.6 bush hairs instantly.
 
Quote from drcha:

I see clockwise, but... I am about as left-brained as it gets. What gives?

what gives is that this 'test' is bogus. Check my earlier link in the thread.
 
Counterclockwise (left brain dominant) 13 27.66%
Clockwise (right brain dominant) 34 72.34%
Total: 47 votes 100%

Replies Views Last Post Reverse Sort Order
45 2707 09-20-10 07:15 AM

hmm. that's strange.
 
Quote from jinxu:

Counterclockwise (left brain dominant) 13 27.66%
Clockwise (right brain dominant) 34 72.34%
Total: 47 votes 100%

Replies Views Last Post Reverse Sort Order
45 2707 09-20-10 07:15 AM

hmm. that's strange.
Did some analysis and found something interesting. The 13 and 34 above are Fibonacci numbers. (1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55). The two decimal points: 0.66 and 0.34 are close to the 62/38 Fibonacci ratio. Dividing 13 by 34 gives you 0.382 (13/24 = 0.382).
That's even stranger.
 
Quote from jinxu:

Did some analysis and found something interesting. The 13 and 34 above are Fibonacci numbers. (1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55). The two decimal points: 0.66 and 0.34 are close to the 62/38 Fibonacci ratio. Dividing 13 by 34 gives you 0.382 (13/24 = 0.382).
That's even stranger.
Fib patterns are everywhere. Frost & Prechter (Elliot Wave Principal) do a decent job laying out the basic's. Fib's seem to be panned on ET, but if you read threads / journals many traders use them to identify useful S/R levels. Ratio analysis is the meat and potatoes of it. The intuitive brain is best at spotting them.
 
Quote from jinxu:

Did some analysis and found something interesting. The 13 and 34 above are Fibonacci numbers. (1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55). The two decimal points: 0.66 and 0.34 are close to the 62/38 Fibonacci ratio. Dividing 13 by 34 gives you 0.382 (13/24 = 0.382).
That's even stranger.
I got up early. I was bored and did some more analysis. I found that it's not just the number 13 and 34 that produce 27. It's found by diving each alternative number in the sequence by the total of the two. I've attached a screenshot of the excel file below.

Things to note:
- Fibanncci numbers are made by adding sequencial number starting with 1 1 2(1+1) 3(2+1) 5(3+2)...
- The fibonacci ratio is found by dividng the higher sequencial number. The higher the closer it is.
- As you get to the higher fib numbers in the series, it converges to 27.639 and 72.361.
- The numbers in the decimal pts: 0.639 and 0.361 are very close to the 62/38 Fibonacci ratio.
- Note that the two alternative number 5 and 8 gives you 27.272727 and 72.7272727.
- Note the page number when this discovery was found: page 8.

So why 27? According to these websites, 27 is considered to be a divine number:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/27_(number)
http://27.chrismore.com/
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message554535/pg1
http://www.ridingthebeast.com/numbers/nu27.php
http://www.wisdomportal.com/Dante/Dante55Plato.html

Strange isn't it??? :eek:
 

Attachments

Back
Top