Tracking Trumpcare

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...-health-care-bill_us_59514933e4b02734df2c5070

American Medical Association Slams Senate GOP Health Care Bill

“We sincerely hope that the Senate will take this opportunity to change the course of the current debate,” the doctors’ group says.


The American Medical Association, the nation’s largest doctors’ group, opposes the Senate health care bill, the organization announced in a letter to Senate leaders Monday.

“Medicine has long operated under the precept of Primum non nocere, or ‘first, do no harm.’ The draft legislation violates that standard on many levels,” American Medical Association CEO James Madara wrote to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).

The American Medical Association is the latest health care sector group to express opposition to, or at least serious concerns with, the Senate bill, known as the Better Care Reconciliation Act. McConnell unveiled the bill Thursday and aims to bring it to the Senate floor for a final vote as soon as this week. With 52 Republicans in the Senate, McConnell can only lose two GOP votes if he wants to get the 50 needed to advance the bill. Five Republican senators, however, are already on record against it.

The physicians’ lobbying organization cites numerous problems with the Senate GOP bill, starting with its likely effect of causing many millions of currently insured Americans to lose their health coverage and be unable to afford medical treatments.

“It seems highly likely that a combination of smaller subsidies resulting from lower benchmarks and the increased likelihood of waivers of important protections such as required benefits, actuarial value standards, and out of pocket spending limits will expose low and middle income patients to higher costs and greater difficulty in affording care,” the AMA’s letter says.

The group also takes issue with the legislation’s deep cuts to federal Medicaid spending.

“The Senate proposal to artificially limit the growth of Medicaid expenditures below even the rate of medical inflation threatens to limit states’ ability to address the health care needs of their most vulnerable citizens,” the letter says.

The legislation would make tax credits for private health insurance created by the Affordable Care Act available to fewer people, reduce their value and tie them to plans that have larger deductibles and higher out-of-pocket costs than the policies sold under Affordable Care Act rules.

The bill also would permit states to make sweeping changes to insurance market rules, which would allow insurers to offer very skimpy plans that don’t come with a basic set of guaranteed benefits and that could exclude treatments and medicines for people with high-cost ailments.

Although insurers would still be forbidden to reject customers with pre-existing conditions or charge them higher rates ― as is the case under the Affordable Care Act ― relaxing the benefit rules and introducing plans that require patients to pay more out-of-pocket would make the coverage less valuable, especially to people with pre-existing conditions.

The Senate bill would undo the Affordable Care Act’s expansion of Medicaid and end the current open-ended federal commitment to pay more than half the expense of covering any eligible Medicaid enrollee. Instead, federal Medicaid funding would be capped at a flat amount per person or a flat amount per state, based on a state’s preference, that would grow more slowly than current Medicaid spending and more slowly than rising health care costs overall.

The Congressional Budget Office analysis of the Senate bill is scheduled to be released Monday. The CBO earlier concluded that the House-passed American Health Care Act, which is similar to the Senate measure, would lead to 23 million fewer people having health coverage over the next 10 years.

“We sincerely hope that the Senate will take this opportunity to change the course of the current debate and work to fix problems with the current system. We believe that Congress should be working to increase the number of Americans with access to quality, affordable health insurance instead of pursuing policies that have the opposite effect, and we renew our commitment to work with you in that endeavor,” the AMA’s letter concludes.

Also on Monday, the National Association of Medicaid Directors, which represents the state officials who oversee the program, rejected the Medicaid components of the Senate bill.

The legislation would give states greater leeway to decide who is eligible for Medicaid and what benefits the program must cover, but these regulators argue that flexibility doesn’t make up for the much lower funding amounts. Several governors have expressed similar concerns.

“No amount of administrative or regulatory flexibility can compensate for the federal spending reductions that would occur as a result of this bill,” the Medicaid officials said in a statement.

“Changes in the federal responsibility for financing the program must be accompanied by clearly articulated statutory changes to Medicaid to enable states to operate effectively under a cap,” they went on. “The Senate bill does not accomplish that. It would be a transfer of risk, responsibility, and cost to the states of historic proportions.”

The National Governors Association, which represents state chief executives from both parties, also weighed in on the Senate bill Monday, urging McConnell to slow down.

“Governors must be given adequate time to determine the impact any health care bill will have on their states and residents, and ensure that the bill does not adversely harm the people we were elected to serve,” Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) and Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker (R) wrote to McConnell on behalf of all 50 governors. “We urge you to give states sufficient time to review the legislation before proceeding, so that the full impact of the legislation may be understood and explained to the American people.”

Numerous other health care groups also have misgivings or are outright opposed to passage of the Senate health care bill. They include:

The American Academy of Family Physicians

The American Academy of Pediatrics

The American Hospital Association

The Federation of American Hospitals

The Children’s Hospital Association

America’s Essential Hospitals

The Catholic Health Association of the United States

The American Cancer Society Action Network

The American Lung Association

AARP

They're MDs, what do they know about healthcare? Trump knows more than the doctors I bet.
 
1ku1am.jpg


Trump University College of Medicine
 

After reading the details of the Senate healthcare bill, I am starting to come to the conclusion that the Senate healthcare replacement bill is worse for America than Obamacare. It all comes down to trade-offs. The Senate healthcare bill would likely cause premiums to stop rising rapidly at 20%+ per year and revert to the pre-ACA range of 10% per year. However co-pays and other costs would go up under the Senate bill. Premiums for older individuals on "ACA" plans would rise. More uncovered people would cram hospital emergency rooms for care.

This gets back to the bottom line. Obamacare is not financially sound. Obamacare-light proposed by the Senate is not sound either. If the citizens of the U.S. believe that universal healthcare is an appropriate public benefit then we need to adopt a single-payer plan. There are plenty of countries providing single-payer (public/private) coverage that can be used as examples. I am not going to say that single-payer does not have its drawbacks (long waits, etc.) but it certainly is more cost-effective than Obamacare. If the citizens of the U.S. do not support universal care than we should revert our system to what it was prior to Obamacare.
 
revert to the pre-ACA range of 10% per year.

That's nonsense


"Still, the slow rate of growth was good news for premiums: The total average family plan cost increased by 43 percent from 2008 to 2016, but it went up more than double that rate — 97 percent — from 2000 to 2008."

http://www.factcheck.org/2017/03/employer-premiums-and-the-aca/

This gets back to the bottom line. Obamacare is not financially sound.

Trump admin says otherwise


https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...wn-data-says-obamacare-isnt-imploding.310981/
 
That's nonsense


"Still, the slow rate of growth was good news for premiums: The total average family plan cost increased by 43 percent from 2008 to 2016, but it went up more than double that rate — 97 percent — from 2000 to 2008."

http://www.factcheck.org/2017/03/employer-premiums-and-the-aca/



Trump admin says otherwise


https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...wn-data-says-obamacare-isnt-imploding.310981/

You have already been handed your head on the subject of premium increases pre and post ACA in the past week. You can continue to believe your fantasy, or join the world or actual facts & data which show the average increase pre ACA was 10% and post ACA was over 20%.
 
You have already been handed your head on the subject of premium increases pre and post ACA in the past week. You can continue to believe your fantasy, or join the world or actual facts & data which show the average increase pre ACA was 10% and post ACA was over 20%.

By handed you mean you linked to far right paid stooges who wrote what they were paid for while you ignore NON PARTISAN analysis - the kind I linked to. I mean, if you are going to make the claim that premiums only rose 10% prior to ACA - that's the biggest lie of all.

"average increase pre ACA was 10%"

Yea right, what a laughable claim. Anybody with decent insurance would know that claim is pure baloney.
 
By handed you mean you linked to far right paid stooges who wrote what they were paid for while you ignore NON PARTISAN analysis - the kind I linked to. I mean, if you are going to make the claim that premiums only rose 10% prior to ACA - that's the biggest lie of all.

"average increase pre ACA was 10%"

Yea right, what a laughable claim. Anybody with decent insurance would know that claim is pure baloney.

Anyone who pays for their own insurance knows that your claims are nonsense.
 
Absolutely hilarious if reality was not such an embarrassing scandal.

LOL, voters from the nation's largest economy and biggest federal contributor are 'deadbeats' while voters from the moocher states who feed off welfare while waiting for their coal jobs to come back are the real deal.

Don't get me started on the flip flops, the biggest liar known to man is your leader, you don't get to talk about flip flops anymore.

Success looks like Trump University, a sucker born a minute.
 
Back
Top