Tracking Trumpcare

Tony Stark said:
Got us 3 million more votes last time.
More...

Bunch of deadbeats votes from California. Precisely why we need the electoral college.

And what exactly did those "3 million more votes" get you? Oh, that's right a deadbeat candidate who is now home in Chappaqua watching the Price is Right in her nighty all day long and putting her flip flops on to go out and get the mail every other day.

That's fine. Works for me and apparently that is what success looks like to you.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
Bunch of deadbeats votes from California. Precisely why we need the electoral college.

And what exactly did those "3 million more votes" get you? Oh, that's right a deadbeat candidate who is now home in Chappaqua watching the Price is Right in her nighty all day long and putting her flip flops on to go out and get the mail every other day.

That's fine. Works for me and apparently that is what success looks like to you.
More...

LOL, voters from the nation's largest economy and biggest federal contributor are 'deadbeats' while voters from the moocher states who feed off welfare while waiting for their coal jobs to come back are the real deal.

Don't get me started on the flip flops, the biggest liar known to man is your leader, you don't get to talk about flip flops anymore.

Success looks like Trump University, a sucker born a minute.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
Bunch of deadbeats votes from California. Precisely why we need the electoral college.

And what exactly did those "3 million more votes" get you? Oh, that's right a deadbeat candidate who is now home in Chappaqua watching the Price is Right in her nighty all day long and putting her flip flops on to go out and get the mail every other day.

That's fine. Works for me and apparently that is what success looks like to you.
More...

91 % of the time more votes gets you the Presidency.We came up short in 2016 but the last time we had 2 close presidential election wins without the popular vote (1876, 1888) it didn't happen again for over 100 years. The odds of Trump winning again without the popular vote are very small and considering trumps approval rating has dropped 10 points since he was elected he is likely to get millions of fewer votes next time.
 
Tony Stark said:
91 % of the time more votes gets you the Presidency.We came up short in 2016 but the last time we had 2 close presidential election wins without the popular vote (1876, 1888) it didn't happen again for over 100 years. The odds of Trump winning again without the popular vote are very small and considering trumps approval rating has dropped 10 points since he was elected he is likely to get millions of fewer votes next time.
More...


Trump's approval rating can be very low and still be higher than the loser that the democrats have and will put up. Did you not learn that lesson last November?

In addition you have to worry about Comrade Bernie going third party and splitting the lefty vote. You may think that he would not be willing to be a spoiler but he knows that the next few years are his last hurrah and he is more than willing to leave his mark in the history books as the first socialist candidate promoting single payer. In the past he did not want to be the spoiler and then have to return to the senate or the political scene and face democrats. But those years are behind him now.

Don't get too cocky about trump. He could very easily do one term and then announce that he wants to return to the private sector and is honored to be replaced by the distinquished Mike Pence who will continue his good work. Better hope you have someone better than Corey Booker, Fauxcahontis, or Bernie if that happens, although it is clear that you dems do like to take a beating. I know that you think that Pelosi and Maxine Waters are hot, but they are not going be able to git er done.
 
Last edited:
Tony Stark said:
No,because Hillary had higher favorable ratings
More...



And you know this how? Oh, I see, from the same polling groups that said that Hillary was overwhelming favored to win.

Might want to think about that a bit. Also, the dem candidate could have higher favorability rating their supporters wont show up to vote if it rains or unless you offer them free cigarettes and a ride. Tis the nature of the dems.
 
Last edited:
TreeFrogTrader said:
And you know this how? Oh, I see, from the same polling groups that said that Hillary was overwhelming favored to win.

Might want to think about that a bit. Also, the dem candidate could have higher favorability rating their supporters wont show up to vote if it rains or unless you offer them free cigarettes and a ride. Tis the nature of the dems.
More...


National polls don't give odds,they tell you who will get the most votes.Dems showed up to give the democratic candidate the most votes in 6 of the last 7 presidential elections and in 2020 dems will be more eager to vote than we were in 2008 so I'm not concerned about rain.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
And you know this how?Oh, I see, from the same polling groups that said that Hillary was overwhelming favored to win.
More...

Yes the polls showed Hillary had higher favorable numbers than trump but that was also confirmed by her getting 3 million more votes.
 
Tony Stark said:
Yes the polls showed Hillary had higher favorable numbers than trump but that was also confirmed by her getting 3 million more votes.
More...

She got most of those votes from places like California and Oregon where Trump did not even bother to campaign other than an appearance because the electoral votes belonged to any democrat on the ticket- and I do mean anything democrat. So dont get too excited about thinking that Hillary has a high favorability rating. But yeh, she did well in states that trump simply wrote off if that excites you. Trump- of course- was campaigning to win. If he had to sacrifice the Simi Valley vote, well then, that's sad.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
She got most of those votes from places like California and Oregon where Trump did not even bother to campaign other than an appearance because the electoral votes belonged to any democrat on the ticket- and I do mean anything democrat. So dont get too excited about thinking that Hillary has a high favorability rating. But yeh, she did well in states that trump simply wrote off if that excites you. Trump- of course- was campaigning to win. If he had to sacrifice the Simi Valley vote, well then, that's sad.
More...


Hillary barely campaigned in WI ,MN,CO,VA MI etc spending less than 3 days in each of those states from from June 7 to election day .She also didn't bother to campaign in places like California and Oregon.She also didn't bother to campaign in Texas,where most of the major cities are democrat.Hillary barely campaigned and she got 3 million more votes and only lost The EC by 78,000.That mistake wont be repeated in 2020.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top