Toughest trade in the world: S & P 500?

Quote from OldTrader:

I Intraday charts? I don't think you're going to make big money until you put the intraday chart away, and start to look at what really causes movement....it's not your 1 minute chart, or the stochastics on it.

If you're trading a small account the SP becomes a difficult trade. If you overleverage yourself I think it becomes difficult. Smaller size is better in my opinion (relative to your account). Trading too many times a day just gives yourself more opportunity to be caught up by the noise, or to have errors in judgment.

I would suggest that you step back a little, relax. Think of the SP as a $111 stock. On a stock of that price you would not find it unusual for the stock to rise or fall $1. You probably would not be trying to make 10-20 cents. Now just add a zero to these numbers....1110, 10 points, 1-2 points.

OldTrader

What timeframes would you consider?

Tnx
 
Quote from stockfrosty:

Whether you trade the mini, the big contract or the SPY, you are trading in the most competitive trading arena in the world. Why trade such a difficult instrument? The odds are againts you because you are trading againts the best traders in the world. If you want a challenge, climb a mountain or run a marathon. If you want to make cash as easily and consistently as possible, trade something other than the S & P.

Reasons why the S & P is the toughest trade include:

1) No leading indicator (especially if you trade the e mini)

2) Time and sales is useless because it is too thick and volume is mostly arb/program related anyway.

3) No NYSE Open book to establish risk levels

4) Intraday price action is close to random (it rarely trends cleanly and false breakouts are prevalent)

5) In the absence of news the S & P is dominated by a few large speculators who manipulate the market exceptionally well, which essentially adds up to one big cash grab)

6) Market is affected by a practically endless number of variables which make intraday price action as close to random as I've every seen in any market.

It all adds up to a very difficult trade. So what I'm asking is, again, why do so many insexperienced small time traders trade it? It is a recipe for loss.

When I read a post like this, I often think of what any person should ask themselves about getting into trading.

Like asking a set of about 20 universal questions.

A key that would lead each person to where they could have a terrific place to begin and to operate from.

You wound up in a place, where for you, it all adds up to a very difficult trade. Others build a perfect place for repeated failure from which they will never emerge. Why can't people be reasonable?

By that I mean why can't people reason through some process like a tree of questions that simply take them to one of the many branches to be successful.

You are asking: "Why do so many insexperienced small time traders trade it?"

Certainly not an important question.

I often imagine just a regular person from any walk of life taking the trouble to reason through a set of questions that he can make up the answers to. The careful answers allow him to begin and follow a CPM or GANNT or something to being successful.
What ever your questions, you have gotten to:

Q1.

A1. No leading indicator.

Q2.

A2. Time and sales is useless

Q3.

A3. Intraday price action is close to random

Q4.

A4. No __________ to establish risk levels

Q5. Not for you but for others.

A5. essentially adds up to one big cash grab

Q6.

A6. endless number of variables which make intraday price action as close to random

and so on.......

Why can't a person like you come up with the Q's. Wrong Q's and who cares about these six answers. Then look at what was spawned by this beginning with other responders.
 
Quote from waggie945:

If you think that the S&P futures chop around a lot and do not trend very well, I would suggest that you stay away from Gold, Silver, Coffee, Cocoa, Natural Gas, blah, blah, blah . . .

In any event, for me trading the S&P is much more time "effective" since there is not nearly as much research to do when trading this product, technically. I mean, how many times have you been long a particular stock, but it did not move up when the overal "market" rallied. You had all of the moving averages lined-up, pivots, retracement levels, etc and it just didn't move. As a result, with stocks, you have to make certain that you are in the right sector otherwise you are wasting your time.

With the S&P, you are IN the market!

Spot on!
With stocks you sometimes have no chance of getting out because the market is closed, when some news break. The ES and similar futures (Kospi 200 as well) are the fastest growing instruments, gaining in popularity all around the world markets.
It get's to be more of a "game" with the big players using their bags of tricks, but it still beats stocks, because in the end you're still dependent on the broad market - in the case of the ES.

Stocks is way lazier when you've done the research and taken the position - the ES demands much more of your attention, especially when daytrading.

The ES is by far a much more level playingfield than the stocks with their shadowy marketmakers. Trading it however, requires that you be very alert and be very easy to influence with regards to opinion of market direction. ES and stocks are almost fundamentally different with regards to how you approach trades, in my opinion, because of the fact that you need to consider each trade like the first trade - and not as a continuation - because of the rapidly changing market bias.
:)
 
[
OldTrader

What timeframes would you consider?

Tnx
[/QUOTE]

Not sure where you are headed with this question. I do not trade from intraday charts, so I have no time frame there. If you're talking about my holding period, alot depends on how confident I am about the direction. Some positions I'll hold for a few days. Most of the time though I'm an intraday type of trader. I'll take profits when the move gets overexuberant.

OldTrader
 
Quote from trade-ya1:

I agree 100%. I've been trading most developed markets for almost 15 years now and I believe that the only market that I am a net loser in is the S&P. In contrast, I believe that $/Yen is probably the easiest most trendy market of all the major markets. I am going to remember your point the next time I think I see an 'easy' trade in the S&P. It's the toughest game in town. Thanks. Neal.

Just goes to show ya that different markets treat different people differently at different times. (I think Yogi Berra said that).

Over the last couple of months, the ES has been my best friend; but the Yen has been a major misbehaver...for me.

Go figure...

saxon
 
Quote from OldTrader:

[
OldTrader

What timeframes would you consider?

Tnx


Not sure where you are headed with this question. I do not trade from intraday charts, so I have no time frame there. If you're talking about my holding period, alot depends on how confident I am about the direction. Some positions I'll hold for a few days. Most of the time though I'm an intraday type of trader. I'll take profits when the move gets overexuberant.

OldTrader
[/QUOTE]

Thanks. I have send you a PM.
 
Just to give you people some context, I'm a filter trader. I use first alert (Neovest).

I've been extremely consistent as a day trader trading primarily NYSE but more recently I've been trading some volatile NAZ stocks like RIMM and TASR.

If I examine my P n L what I find is the following. Out of the last 100 days I've had 85 winning days and 15 losing days. 10 of the 15 losing days were days that I traded the SPY. And when I net my losses I've found that 67% of the loss was in the SPY (S n P 500)

I've had some success trading the S n P, (taken up to 12 handles in intraday swings) but over an extented period I've found I generally end up giving any gains right back to the thing. I believe it is a difficult trade relative to the stocks that pops into my filters and I gave a few of my reasons why.

If you are making money trading the S n P, my hat goes off to you. You are competing againts the best traders in the world and winning. At the end of the day, cash is king. So if ya make cash, keep doing what you are doing.

All I want people to take from my contribution to this forum is the fact that I am a trader who has been consistently profitable trading stocks but has had a difficult time with the S n P. I've given the thing my best shot and have decided to leave it alone. Because, again I've found easier money elsewhere, and as a professional trader, making money is my objective.

Draw whatever conclusions you'd like from my experience. But I figured some traders might find that information useful in some way.

Cheers to everyone who contributed to the discussion.
 
Quote from lescor:

Yes it's true. There are soooo many ways to extract money from the financial markets. I've gravitated to basically cherry picking the easy stuff (it's out there).

Q: Why continuously bang your head against a wall?

A: Because it feels so good when you stop.


Haven't read this whole thread, but.......

Excellent advice lescor. If newbies could only realize when a nugget like this is thrown out here on ET, it would make their journey much easier. Reminds me of so many little gems in "Reminiscences Of A Stock Operator". (Had to reach over for my copy to spell that word..."reminiscences":) ) "Back in the good ol' days" around here, learning was much easier. Now there's so much "noise", good advice is often hard to see. But, your post here is a good example. (You got a copyright on this nugget???)
 
Y'all keep saying the s&p has the best traders in the world, but since it tracks the underlying value of the stocks in the index very very closely, than those stocks must also have the best traders in the world.

Where, exactly, can I find the worst traders in the world to trade
against?

And don't answer EliteTrader, please.
 
Back
Top