Total US Debt Rises Over $18 Trillion; Up 70% Under Barack Obama

[Spike Trader]

Congress is like Middle Management , its them who should be co-operating with The Board of Directors. If they did their job instead of blocking Head Office on everything the US would be years ahead of where it is now.
I'm sorry you're so upset.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Congress is like Middle Management , its them who should be co-operating with The Board of Directors. If they did their job instead of blocking Head Office on everything the US would be years ahead of where it is now.
I'm sorry you're so upset.

The Board of Directors approves plans, they don't develop them, nor do they actually "direct". The CEO tries to sell the ideas to the Board and it is the Board's job to represent the best interest of the shareholders.

To stay on the same analogy, it's too bad the CEO (President) doesn't do what the shareholders (voters) want him to.

Your analogy makes the (very incorrect) assumption that there are no bad CEOS, and that all directions from the CEO should be heeded always. But I'm not surprised, given your complete and utter lack of real world experience.

 

[Spike Trader]

As for Republicans doing the same, we're all over them on this forum every time they screw up. Hell, Jem made a post about it not one hour ago! The difference is you let Democrats get away with everything.

You're mad at Republicans because of their failure to grab control despite voters giving them endless opportunities , not because they have messed up the country.

 

[Tsing Tao]

You're mad at Republicans because of their failure to grab control despite voters giving them endless opportunities , not because they have messed up the country.

They've essentially done both, just as Democrats have. You don't know shit about me (or anything else for that matter), much less why I am angry.

 

[Spike Trader]

The Board of Directors approves plans, they don't develop them, nor do they actually "direct". The CEO tries to sell the ideas to the Board and it is the Board's job to represent the best interest of the shareholders.

To stay on the same analogy, it's too bad the CEO (President) doesn't do what the shareholders (voters) want him to.

That is your opinion , many voters are are happy with his performance given the circumstances.

Your analogy makes the (very incorrect) assumption that there are no bad CEOS, and that all directions from the CEO should be heeded always. But I'm not surprised, given your complete and utter lack of real world experience.

Please tell me what good is your real world experience doing when you're whining on an internet forum.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Please tell me what good is your real world experience doing when you're whining on an internet forum.

My real world experience allows me to properly state expertise when I have it. If you aren't here to discuss politics or economics, etc., then you must be here to troll. Are you here to troll, Spike? Is that your objective?

The point to a politics forum is to discuss politics.

 

[Spike Trader]

You don't know shit about me (or anything else for that matter).

It's pointless discussing anything with people who have attitudes like this.

 

[dbphoenix]

It's pointless discussing anything with people who have attitudes like this.

At least you know he's an asshole. Your attention and time are better spent on someone else.

 

[Tsing Tao]

It's pointless discussing anything with people who have attitudes like this.

Boo fucking hoo...

This happens all the time. You butt your nose into a discussion, claim I've made a wrong analysis or that something I've said is incorrect. I ask you to tell me what's incorrect, and you begin your usual back peddling with the crescendo resulting in you crying foul and scurrying off, claiming that I'm a "meanie". Well, I am a meanie to ignorant whelps who pretend to know something - anything - and have nothing more than a passing glance on the subject but yet try to get into an argument on it. Don't like my response? Don't pick a fight unless you've got a substantial understanding of the topic you're trying to defend. You don't see me in the climate threads - because I don't claim to know what I'm talking about there.

The encore to this pathetic act is dbgarland either "liking" your post, or making some inept comment to try to get a jab in at me, and soothe your hurt feelings.

What's hilarious about it is that Lucrum was more vile and harsh to you and you always giggled and smiled at him. This means that, without question, it's not my tone or being mean, but that you're just way out of your league when you try to pick arguments with me. That's the same reason dbgarland tries to ignore everything I say.

 

[Spike Trader]

Nah . . . you're not a ''meanie'' at all , you are a loud mouth tho. What i said was i'd like to see someone write something meaningfull about Loyek's post. You got touched when your post was classed as'' kitchen table economics''.(not by me) So get over that will you.

As for Lucrum, he was one of the dumbest mofo to ever surf this website even being reduced to posting cartoons, and you resorting to juvenile ''dbgarland'' tactics says a lot about how you really think.