Total US Debt Rises Over $18 Trillion; Up 70% Under Barack Obama

Is Iran nuclear just because you say so , or is Iran in possession of nuclear bombs ?
If your answer is yes , please provide credible sources.

Alex Jones won't cut it.

Once again, Iran has the ability to manufacture weapons grade uranium (through enrichment procedures). That is all that is required to be considered having nuclear capability. Additionally, they have the capability to manufacture and launch medium range ballistic missiles to put that capability on. There is very little work to be done to convert the transport mechanism and package the deal. But they are nuclear.

And I don't read Alex Jones, as I've said many times here.
 
Iran does not have nuclear weapons.If Iran were attacked today they can not retaliate with nuclear weapons.

This does not mean they are not nuclear. That's the whole point. You can't just paint a black and white picture and claim they aren't nuclear, even when it suits your narrative.

Please feel free to learn something:

https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Clapper_02-09-16.pdf

This was a year ago. See page 12 for synopsis on Iran and capabilities.

Some key phrases:

"We also continue to assess that Iran does not face any insurmountable technical barriers to producing a nuclear weapon, making Iran’s political will the central issue."

"We continue to assess that Iran’s overarching strategic goals of enhancing its security, prestige, and regional influence have led it to pursue capabilities to meet its nuclear energy and technology goals and give it the ability to build missile-deliverable nuclear weapons, if it chooses to do so."
 
This does not mean they are not nuclear. That's the whole point. You can't just paint a black and white picture and claim they aren't nuclear, even when it suits your narrative.

Please feel free to learn something:

https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Clapper_02-09-16.pdf

This was a year ago. See page 12 for synopsis on Iran and capabilities.

Some key phrases:

"We also continue to assess that Iran does not face any insurmountable technical barriers to producing a nuclear weapon, making Iran’s political will the central issue."

"We continue to assess that Iran’s overarching strategic goals of enhancing its security, prestige, and regional influence have led it to pursue capabilities to meet its nuclear energy and technology goals and give it the ability to build missile-deliverable nuclear weapons, if it chooses to do so."
Iran does not have nuclear weapons.If Iran were attacked today they can not retaliate with nuclear weapons.
 
Iran does not have nuclear weapons.If Iran were attacked today they can not retaliate with nuclear weapons.

Repeating the same phrase over and over again doesn't mean you are correct when you say Iran is not a nuclear power.

Futurecurrents takes that approach all the time, and he is as big a fool as you.
 
It's common knowledge that Iran has the knowhow to develop nuclear bombs. Under Obama and a coalition of international countries they agreed to terminate building them . The International Atomic Agency have conducted inspections and agrees.
 
It's common knowledge that Iran has the knowhow to develop nuclear bombs. Under Obama and a coalition of international countries they agreed to terminate building them . The International Atomic Agency have conducted inspections and agrees.

Yes, because the Iranians have always upheld their agreements in the past, never trying to hide activity from the "inspections" (which are limited to agreed sites) before.

You folks are real bright.
 
It's common knowledge that Iran has the knowhow to develop nuclear bombs. Under Obama and a coalition of international countries they agreed to terminate building them . The International Atomic Agency have conducted inspections and agrees.

True.

As Vanzandt stated earlier unlike NK Trump can stop Iran without them retaliating with nuclear weapons.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top