GWB you cannot say 99% were found to be legitimate.... many of them the DA or police department refused to follow through with charges or simply took the police side because the other side is dead.
Look up Freddie Gray or Sandra Bland... what about the guy who was shot in the back running away and the cop was going to lie and plant a weapon...BUT...someone video taped it. Only reason charges were brought.
Most cases it is cop word versus a dead guy and cop wins. Why are body armour cameras conveniently left off.
Dont believe because 99% of the cases a cop was not charged that 99% of the time the system was fair and the cops went through full due process and were found innocent.
There are too many cases to google and show you where the cop got in trouble ONLY because there was videotape and many instances were no cops were charged because there were no witnesses (Bland, Gray).
We are not talking only about cases where a guy pulls a gun and gets shot or attacks an officer and such. There are more than enough of unarmed and or compliant Black men who were shot by an itchy trigger finger (Castile). No one complains when a criminal is shot by a cop in self defense, but when a misdeamonr results in getting shot, we have a problem.
Look at this white guy who is armed resisting arrrest not get hit, tasered, or shot at all
WHat about this:
White guy punches a cop and assaults 7 others and is taken into custody. Really?
https://qz.com/477383/one-year-afte...n-assaults-7-cops-and-lives-to-tell-the-tale/
Don't believe that just because there are some criminals getting shot by police that all of these are clean cases. a white guy can punch an officer in the face and no one pulls a gun to take him down?
A Black woman tells a cop she can smoke in her car if she wants to and ends up dead?
If you accept that there are cases where police are crooked and either plant or tamper with evidence, or rig the way the evidence is presented (and why would you not accept this as we have seen it happen) then you have to assume there is some "error rate" in the prosecution and/or review of these cops post action reports. This is just a logical conclusion. Therefore, the reported numbers of when a copy is found innocent or "in the right" must be overstated. Said another way, the actions of the police officer in some cases where the officer was cleared were incorrect for some reason (tampered evidence, etc).
But to post a graphic and claim that all these cases where a black man was killed by a police officer were all cases of corruption is completely and totally ridiculous. It is this type of hyperbole causing problems.
If you took all the cases where an officer was cleared of wrong doing and put them on the right and all the cases where people claim the suspect was "murdered" and put them on the left, the truth is likely very close to the right (but admittedly not on the right).
You kind of jumped on my post without reading what I was answering.
GWB claimed that if 99% of cases of Black man getting shot by police had no convictions then 99% of the time they were valid. We know this to not be true with quick review of many recent cases.
I knew precisely who you were answering and what you were responding to. I was agreeing with your premise.
Did you read my post?
yeah and the implication was not the opposite that all were due to excessive force/racist corruption. I was just shocked that seeing 99% someone thought that must mean they are all valid haha.
With as much scrutiny as cops are under today with the widespread use of call phone video plus body cam cameras on the cops -- are you trying to claim that a significant percentage of fatal shootings by officers are somehow excessive. I think the huge majority today are legitimate (probably approaching 99%) and that bad cops are more readily identified & arrested.
The problem is the bad actors within a police force are protected by the blue wall and do not get properly removed from police forces even after many incidents of poor behavior. Down the road their poor behavior escalates to a fatal situation when they should have been removed from the force years earlier. As public servants that "protect and service" , the most important trait for a cop is "integrity". when they lose this then they lose the public trust.