Topsteptrader

A lot of TSTs parameters are useless statistics IMO. I'm going to apply with MES and see where it goes. Seems like there parameters let a trader do more.
TST is great for developing self imposed limitations
 
I keep reading about the 11 day balance.?? There is nothing I can find about it on TST.
What exactly is this.??

As others have posted, it's the amount of equity (i.e. your account balance) on the 10th trading day in the live account, which then serves as your maximum total draw allowance from Day 11 going forward.

Don't be influenced by those who claim a small account balance will turn into a large account balance (unless, of course, you have seen adequate proof of such occurrences, and you are able to duplicate such a result).
 
I mentioned that others in this thread have said that the average Combine-level people are passing works out at around $30k. Given all the people I see passing who have taken $100k/$150k Combines, if "around $30k" is indeed the average (and I have no evidence either way, myself, on this point), then there must certainly be huge numbers of people passing the $10k Combine, to make the figures average out that way.

Ok, I misread your post. Yes, you clearly mentioned average and not "most" so my response to your post was incorrect.

It's quite possible given the hundreds of traders who have passed the combines, there are people who have taken all of the various levels (10k through 150k).

Again, the key measure is not the passing of the combine itself, but instead it's whether or not the traders who pass the combines are trading well beyond the Day 11 balance.
 
Ok, I misread your post. Yes, you clearly mentioned average and not "most" so my response to your post was incorrect.

It's quite possible given the hundreds of traders who have passed the combines, there are people who have taken all of the various levels (10k through 150k).

Again, the key measure is not the passing of the combine itself, but instead it's whether or not the traders who pass the combines are trading well beyond the Day 11 balance.


I agree with all the above.

It's just strange, though, that one can't apparently show any enthusiasm for TST's business, facilities and achievements without being falsely accused accused of being a "shill" for them.

In this thread, I'm called a "TST shill" if I point out the factual inaccuracies in some of their detractors' posts.

In other threads, I'm called an "Al Brooks shill" if I comment that I found his books valuable and might not even be making a living without them.

One can express negative opinions very freely here, causing no consternation at all.

But if one shows any enthusiasm or positivity, that produces false accusations and hostility.

It's a funny kind of forum, that way.
 
I agree with all the above.

It's just strange, though, that one can't apparently show any enthusiasm for TST's business, facilities and achievements without being falsely accused accused of being a "shill" for them.

In this thread, I'm called a "TST shill" if I point out the factual inaccuracies in some of their detractors' posts.

In other threads, I'm called an "Al Brooks shill" if I comment that I found his books valuable and might not even be making a living without them.

One can express negative opinions very freely here, causing no consternation at all.

But if one shows any enthusiasm or positivity, that produces false accusations and hostility.

It's a funny kind of forum, that way.

Ohh dear. A case of the pot calling the kettle black.
 
you work for or have a vested interest in TST.

Beats me why you are so hostile towards them.

I am not sure to whom exactly you are talking to because quite a few gentlemen here are on my Ignore list so I don't see every nugget that idiots drop here, but if I have to take a wild guess, because MES is a competitor to TST, and competition is BAD for business.
 
Hey Xela. Do you have any other "Facts" to back this up. What about this report.??
http://www.tradingschools.org/reviews/mes-capital-update/
I will be trying them out shortly & I will keep you all posted as to how I get on with them.

Thanks for posting the link, I wasn't aware of that site. The banter exchange between the posts after the MES review was quite entertaining. I recall the prior ET thread where MES was mentioned, however there was very little information regarding the firm.

It's important to weigh ALL of the new information before passing judgement. As you cited in a prior post, it costs you "NOTHING" to try their model (except of course your time, which is indeed an opportunity cost).
 
It would love to be taken that way, I'm sure. That would be a very flattering description of it, though!

It seems by all credible accounts to be a shabby, anonymously-run little scam: https://futures.io/vendors-product-...resprofile-owner-lies-about-his-identity.html

Xela,

Did you actually read ALL 8 pages of the thread? A "scam" has a very distinct definition, such as the following:

scam (def): "A fraudulent business scheme, a swindle. An illegal plan for making money, especially one that involves tricking people. A dishonest scheme."

According to the thread you cited, it seems the owner was accused of disguising his true identity as a competing vendor on a message board where traders can post anonymously. However, where is your evidence that MES Capital is actually running a "scam?"

Your prior posts indicate objective analysis, so it's surprising to read such an accusation without any facts to back up the claim.
 
Last edited:
Xela,

Did you actually read ALL 8 pages of the thread? A "scam" has a very distinct definition, such as the following:

scam (def): "A fraudulent business scheme, a swindle. An illegal plan for making money, especially one that involves tricking people. A dishonest scheme."

According to the thread you cited, it seems the owner was accused of disguising his true identity as a competing vendor on a message board where traders can post anonymously. However, where is your evidence that MES Capital is actually running a "scam?"

Your prior posts indicate objective analysis, so it's surprising to read such an accusation without any facts to back up the claim.
@Xela is trying to give good advices to a sucker and she's asked to prove her statements... Where is your evidence that it isn't ? Out there it's Guilty until proven innocent. Not the reverse. Because we know most products are toxic when it comes to finance.
 
Back
Top