I differ with his definition of trading aggressively if it suggests exceeding the scale up required by the live account. In other words, trade AS IF it was already a live account and thereby with the scale up rules, weekly loss rules, etc.,
That seems good advice, to me.
I disagreed with most of what he said, thought it was silly, and wasn't at all surprised that his Combine lasted only 3 days.
I see many people failing Combines through using excessive position-sizes.
If you have a good method with a genuine edge, excessive position-sizes are
certainly one of the ways to screw up a Combine, where patience would get you through.
you also mentioned the majority of traders are passing the 30k combines
I didn't actually say that at all.
Nor do I believe that's so.
I mentioned that others in this thread have said that the
average Combine-level people are passing works out at around $30k. Given all the people I see passing who have taken $100k/$150k Combines, if "around $30k"
is indeed the average (and I have no evidence either way, myself, on this point), then there must certainly be
huge numbers of people passing the $10k Combine, to make the figures average out that way.