They would love if someone did this because they will essentially be giving money away. ok they get "funded" but you still need to prove the managing risk part in combine 2 without the second account they will likely crap out paying them the 2x fees.
It seems to me that approaching them on that kind of basis, whether it's technically allowed or not, is tantamount to saying "I'm here to exploit a loophole in your rules" rather than "I'm here to form an alliance with you".
I'm just wondering how you'd expect TST to feel about someone doing that, even if it's allowed? Do you think they'd take it as inherently within their intended objective, or might it perhaps come across to them as slightly "adversarial"?
For me, if I were potentially funding people as TST are, it wouldn't really matter whether or not it's "allowed": I'd know straight away what kind of approach I was dealing with and probably wouldn't have a good feeling about future partnership prospects with someone trying that.
Of course, that's only my own perspective, and I'm notoriously pedantic and humourless. TST themselves might feel completely different about it.![]()

