Has anyone tried passing the combine by having two opposite positions in two Combine accounts, for instance during economic news releases? This way it should be quite easy to reach the profit target.
Call me naive, but I'd always imagined that the objective of qualifying for a funded account with TST was to form a partnership or alliance with them, and trade one of their accounts on a profit-sharing basis, in which both parties profit together.
It seems to me that approaching them on that kind of basis, whether it's technically allowed or not, is tantamount to saying "I'm here to exploit a loophole in your rules" rather than "I'm here to form an alliance with you".
I'm just wondering how you'd expect TST to feel about someone doing that, even if it's allowed? Do you think they'd take it as inherently within their intended objective, or might it perhaps come across to them as slightly "adversarial"?
For me, if I were potentially funding people as TST are, it wouldn't really matter whether or not it's "allowed": I'd know straight away what kind of approach I was dealing with and probably wouldn't have a good feeling about future partnership prospects with someone trying that.
Of course, that's only my own perspective, and I'm notoriously pedantic and humourless. TST themselves might feel completely different about it.
