Actually, no threats...I sometimes talk to Baron via private message via many different issues that I'm complaining about and I'm happy that he even responds considering I know he has bigger problems that he prefers to deal with then these types of
"frickin drama" as you call it.
Simply, just because you may feel you're threaten or feel someone else is threaten...does not imply its a threat to Baron just because you take it personally.
Further, to this specific topic...its already done by users but I just don't point the finger at
specific users just like I don't notify Baron to which specific users are talking about members here at ET, talking about Baron himself nor do I think Baron cares about the even when members here at ET do the same about those elsewhere on social media and then posting direct links to their own tweets about other members here at ET.
- It's a cowardly move but its being done.
For the record, I'm sure Baron knows I don't threaten him and he knows
I poke around a problem in my responses to certain individuals to try to get him to investigate a problem because I was specifically told by different moderators (ET use to have multiple moderators) over the years that they don't read everything and sometimes Baron is
not aware of a problem.
Maybe you're a little green under the collar but the Feedback section has always been drama like the Chit Chat / Political threads whereas sometimes its used appropriately. This has been the situation almost from the beginning. In fact, I think the feedback section has greatly improved...less drama over the years here in the Feedback section since the
marketsurfer days.
I bring marketsurfer up for a specific reason. He's the first ET member that I notice (there may have been others) that use to go on social media and complain about what was occurring here at ET whenever he had heated problems with others here at ET. Members here complained, laughed about it, openly discussed such here at ET whenever he did that including posting direct links to his tweets.
Elitetrader.com has always since I can remember been heated discussed at other trading forums, twitter, facebook and so on or at least when Baron once try to connect / make ET more social media friendly via a link below the message posts in which the message post can be sent to Twitter or something like that.
- I'm not sure why that was only briefly used but it was tried by ET after many members suggested that feature on the message posts.
Also, since this year, I've notice that the
Politics section has in fact been showing up in search with the hashtag #elitetrader. That's the first time I've notice such after a member indirectly mention such in the
Politics section...a member currently creating
hate threads.
My point, what you consider as a threat is already being done by others and I'm not the one creating hate threads in the Politics section. If you're curious, back in 2015, the hashtag #elitetrader did
not have the Politics section as the 2nd result in the search engine.
Back in 2015, the Politics section showed up in the search engine on either the 4th or 5th pages in the search results.
- Today, it now shows up on the 1st result page and in the 2nd listing slot as shown in the screenshot below. Why those particular user names inside the red circle ?
The silly question now...whom is doing it, why, why specific members and not others in the Politics section are showing up in the search results and whom would be offended that I would even mention such here in the Feedback section ?
Simply, I don't always use the direct route with Baron in my private message discussions with him to alert him about something occurring here at his forum. Sometimes I let others make it an issue in which I then make a follow up message post (often in a sarcastic way about something that's already occurring) to it about the situation.
- I'm sure he already knows about the below and is not threaten by it.
Therefore, the
"frickin drama" as you call it has been showing up in the search engines and your reply has now helped alert Baron to such.
View attachment 239539