Quote from nitro:
Well,
That is perhaps true. But I have learned of a great service that IB implements for their institutional clients, and that alone was worth the price of admission.
I do not want to set myself up as anything, let alone someone that manages OPM - PUKE. My desire is to promote helping my profession to clean it up from the people that give it a bad name.
It seems as if your posts are genuinely trying to help, but if you are saying that I am wasting my time with this crap and it is better spent elsewhere, that is almost certainly true.
But I am the man that I am, and the moth goes to a flame...
nitro
Oh I see, it's pure altruism...
BTW, these "Spectating Accounts" that IB offers on the Institutional-side are maintained for transparancy/risk management, not for making audit for public display.
My interest in this thread stems from the illogical-nature of the entire premise; that somehow viewing a trader in r/t will translate into equivalent performace for the trainee. Forget the lack of a stat-valid sampling -- one trader's preformance doesn't necessarily "trickle down"
I understand that your motivations are decent, but it's foolhardy. There's no free lunch in this business -- the majority of retail are sheep and are eager prey for vendors; but this isn't what we're talking about here, you're referring to establishing a track-record, not selling a system, correct?
Anyway, good luck with this. I'll not post further to this thread.
riskarb
riskarb
