to destriero (and all others that can help)

Edmond said:
like I said, cheap ass seiko! Only cost a lousy $10k....panerai is a shit watch as well...
And you just sold your nautilus and made what...a $20-30k profit???

you’re a fucking piker
More...


lol dude you're sitting there in a dago tee overlooking the town dump with your sis. The Nautilus was a double... your post, again, is useless without pics.

You Trumpers are all so predictably poor.
 
KCalhoun said:
Now I've got both watch and gun envy lol.. gotta love well-made mechanical stuff... I collect old vintage saxes
More...


Ken, his home gym is probably insane! Let’s not ask because we will want to kick our old lifecycle, plastic pool and weights!
 
Overnight said:
No. There is something very sexy about a well-built and well-made watch. There's a reason the Pateks, Rolex and Breitlings command so much premium.
More...

You mean like the Rolex in this case? Very sexy indeed... LOL

 
@DiceAreCast is now sounding like a priest (and writing in biblical proportions)! You DEMON @destriero BE GONE, in the name of Jesus, our Lord...

Poor guy has NO idea that him calling Destriero a "demon", is like a compliment...

5,000 Views, but I think the thread crosses 10K Views. The Demon is HUNGRY...


81437824-FFDD-41B4-ACD1-93EB63028604.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Overnight said:
It is funny that this is a thread in the options subforum, and it has de-evolved to this.

Just an observation.
More...

Hey I tried to put in discussions about options and options trading.

JSOP said:
If he's short vol., then he doesn't need to delta-hedge unless he's also directional. But then if he's short vol. AND directional then it's not a butterfly. LOL You cannot be all three at the same time, non-directional and short vol. and be butterfly. It just does not make sense.

And the strategy is not very profitable unless you trade huge volume cuz you are basically limiting yourself in movement and the magnitude of it. In order to make $$ in options, you have to be correct in predicting 2 things, 1) the direction of the move and 2) the magnitude of the move. The $$ comes in with the risk on one or both of them. His strategy wants to reduce or eliminate risk in both then his profit is going to be reduced or eliminated as well since in an efficient market, there is no or very little risk-unadjusted returns. And even if you have large trading capital, this strategy is not very capital or cost-efficient and it's certainly not suitable small trading accounts. The profit will be minuscule with huge commissions. You will be much better off just trading the underlying and hedge.
More...

Did you guys read this??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top