Quote from Spydertrader:
Well Bryce? Instead of attempting to twist the burden of proof onto others, why not simply comply with vikana's request? I understand. Really, I do. Running eight different web sites in order to sell your wares probably takes up a significant portion of your trading day.
- Spydertrader
It's not 8 web sites Spiderman it is one and I have 75+ members who I devote my time to when the market is open not to threads like this.
I put up for them in real time but why should I bother with the jokers on this thread who wouldn't take any notice in the first place.
Pretty simple logic on my part when the consistency in here is to rubbish everything and everyone who has something constructive to say.
One of the big things that I have seen in here is the complete indifference to the original principle of the thread in the beginning.
Some people take it literally that a 6 tick stop has to stay a 6 tick stop and never realise that it can be tightened at times. Many don't even realise that when your position moves for you into profit you can bring your stop into breakeven.
There's a myriad of things none of these jokers have even brought to the table and yet they continue to shrow abuse based on other figments of their imagination.
The bid issue for me this time is that you can see how many wanted to bring up issues that are over 18 months old. It is like they don't even want to learn anything.
And if that is the case then why should I bother trying to.
If there were enough people here who wanted to know they would come forward.
But as I have pointed out there is the 90/10 rule and that is what rules the market and these chat rooms.
BBG