Thunderdome

In all fairness, I think Lester Holt did an average job. Why only average?

  • National Health Care was not brought up.
  • National Security was not brought up.
  • Skyrocketing Tuition for higher education was not brought up.
  • Corporate greed affecting and government inaction affecting millions who can't afford simple live saving drugs, was not brought up.
  • Citizens United and money in politics was not brought up.
Seriously? What fucking country are you living in Lester Holt?

In fact, if he concentrated on just those three things, and had substantive policies to back it up, he would win the swing voters!

But Houdini doesn't explain his magic tricks.
The debate was not intended to be comprehensive. That is why there are two other debates planned. Meanwhile, the general view is that Holt did a fine job:

http://www.businessinsider.com/lester-holt-debate-performance-good-2016-9
 
I mostly agree with this. But non of those people as moderators are correct.

In the age of the internet, the questions should be asked online, with a real-time voting meter up-thumb or down-thumb of suggested questions. A final yea or nay from a political scientist or historian from a major university from the top five questions is selected.

If elections are about voters, why isn't there a system to get them to ask the questions of their representatives?

Once again the republicans find themselves in a problem of their own making. The Presidential Debate Commission is a typical big government/media/corporatist organization, filled with partisan democrats and cuck republicans. They pick moderators from the media, which by definition means they are liberal and biased.

The republicans could pull out of the whole thing or redraw the law establishing it. That however would mean crossing Big Media which the RINOs like Paul Ryan and various cucks are not about to do. So they participate in a charade in which they are bullied and harassed by liberal journalists while the democrat candidate sits smugly out of harm's way. It wouldn't surprise me at all if Hillary had been given the questions before hand, since corruption is inherent in everything the Clintons do.

A better arrangement would be to have three debates and let each candidate pick a single mod for the first two and maybe have two mods for the last debate, one chosen by each candidate. A candidate could hardly complain about unfairness from a mod they had selected, and if their mod was too unfair on the other candidate, a backlash could be expected, plus the mod would lose credibility.

If you had this sort of setup, the first debate maybe would be called by Chris Matthews and the second by Sean Hannity. The third would feature Rachel Maddow and Ann Coulter. Tell me that wouldn't be more entertaining and informative than having a moron like Lester Holt arguing incessantly with Trump?
 
The debate was not intended to be comprehensive. That is why there are two other debates planned. Meanwhile, the general view is that Holt did a fine job:

http://www.businessinsider.com/lester-holt-debate-performance-good-2016-9
Or maybe the idea was to harass Trump with shit questions to get him to drop out? Everyone and his cousin already knows the guy has race issues. Everyone and his cousin already knows that Clinton is at best shady.

  • Please, don't bring up Obama's birth certificate again.
  • Please, don't bring up Clinton's emails again.
  • Please do talk about: National Health Care.
  • Please do talk about: National Security.
  • Please do talk about: Skyrocketing Tuition for higher education.
  • Please do talk about: Corporate greed and government inaction affecting millions who can't afford simple live saving drugs.
  • Please do talk about: Citizens United and money in politics.
  • Please talk about the deficit
  • Please talk about tax fairness
  • Please talk about job creation
  • Please talk about stifling over regulation
  • Please talk about government waste of tax dollars
  • ad-infinitum
 
well, may be some people are making sure the issues you brought up are not discussed broadly.
So that the agenda agreed on these can be implemented.
 
Or maybe the idea was to harass Trump with shit questions to get him to drop out? Everyone and his cousin already knows the guy has race issues. Everyone and his cousin already knows that Clinton is at best shady.

  • Please, don't bring up Obama's birth certificate again.
  • Please, don't bring up Clinton's emails again.
  • Please do talk about: National Health Care.
  • Please do talk about: National Security.
  • Please do talk about: Skyrocketing Tuition for higher education.
  • Please do talk about: Corporate greed and government inaction affecting millions who can't afford simple live saving drugs.
  • Please do talk about: Citizens United and money in politics.
  • Please talk about the deficit
  • Please talk about tax fairness
  • Please talk about job creation
  • Please talk about stifling over regulation
  • Please talk about government waste of tax dollars
  • ad-infinitum
All in one debate? With Ramblin' Donald? Something along the lines of a telethon, perhaps?
 
Nitro, the biggest single issue in the election is immigration. No one cares about Citizens United. Trump missed a big chance with the opening question when he didn't point out how immigration is costing jobs at the low end of the wage scale and bankrupting local governments.
 
Nitro, the biggest single issue in the election is immigration. No one cares about Citizens United. Trump missed a big chance with the opening question when he didn't point out how immigration is costing jobs at the low end of the wage scale and bankrupting local governments.
You are out of touch. How can you even say that? Bernie Sanders got almost 15 million votes on three key issues - one of them was Citizen's United. Keep thinking this way and Trump will be retiring on his golf courses soon.

Immigration is a big issue and should be talked about seriously.
 
Back
Top