this volitility is cause for concern

Quote from bwolinsky:

Checked this in word, and it's correct. "Thread's" is plural, but grammar and spelling is singular, so it is "is".
Wrong and wrong.
 
You dont need to know how to speak any language, let alone how spell ,to trade.

And what the OP stated is absolutely true imo.

When you get crazy movements like this in huge indexes, its usualy a bad sign.

Think about all the equities that were in big trouble .. How did they trade months before they went belly up?

Enr (enron), worldcom, Fre, Fnm, Bsc, Leh, list goes on.


They all had incredible range in every direction (including up) but ultimately headed lower.

Anyway thats what my 10 years experience tells me.

We could and probably will still have crazy run ups. But this sort of volatility usualy spells out trouble for the longs.
 
Quote from Arthur Deco:

A large segment of the educated population * knee jerks that if * you can't spell you aren't worth listening to.

While creating an issue about the OP's spelling, you might consider taking a look at your own grammar and syntax.
 
To the haters concerns, sadly the grammar and syntax doesn't correlate with the P/L. Pay more attention to your trading or I will be happy to take your money:)
 
Quote from PaulRon:

Your spelling is cause for concern.

Why is his slpelnig casue for cocnern? Can you udnrestnad tihs setcnene even tohugh it caonitns seoiusrly cnoufesd argranenemts of letrets?
 
Back
Top