This is why we riot

userque said:
I post to address whatever issue is presented, not simply to debate you. I'm fine with you not talking to me anymore.

View attachment 229554
More...

I didn't say I wouldn't talk to you. I said I didn't plan on engaging in worthwhile conversation with you. I don't have a problem throwing snark, ad hominem commentary, and generally pointing out what a jackass you are.

I tried the other route, you preferred being a dick. So here we are.

I do, however, find it amusing that you are now "liking" Suntrader's posts - the guy you claimed you had on ignore (and then he claimed he had you on ignore). So obviously one of you or both was lying.
 
Last edited:
SunTrader said:
I've lived in the Gun-Shine state for 3 decades now and am well aware of that law.

But I listened to what Dirty Harriet had to say. Did you? If you come into their house.
More...

I did listen. Doesn't change the law. I can defend my property if someone is attacking it or me on it. They don't need to be inside the house. If you claim to understand the law, you should understand that. You do, don't you?
 
El OchoCinco said:
The question is what crimes warrant being killed by police because that is the main difference that is being highlighted. How many white people pulled over for a traffic stop get killed versus Black people. That is where the proportionality difference is striking.

No one is looking to object to a person black or white, who is armed and dangerous getting killed by police in a shoot out. If you argument is more Black people die proportionately because more Black commit crimes proportionately then let's dig deepr.

We can list numerous Black people being stopped for a misdemeanor or less and ending up dead. That makes no sense as police are not judge and jury and do not have the right to execute whoever they want.

However when the justice system does not prosecute the offenders then they get to keep on doing it.

I think if you do a research study of white and black people killed after traffic stops or arrested for misdemeanors and who ends up dead, there is where you will see the proportionately that shows what is being complained about.
More...

Happy to examine any statistics you have to support any of the claims in this post. Apart from that, your beliefs are anecdotal. But you are entitled to them, nonetheless.
 
Tsing Tao said:
I do, however, find it amusing that you are now "liking" Suntrader's posts - the guy you claimed you had on ignore (and then he claimed he had you on ignore). So obviously one of you or both was lying.
More...

Don't be so simple-minded. Let me help you:

I put him on ignore years ago, don't even remember why.
Upon my return to posting, I noticed that I agree with a lot of his posts.
So I took him off block.
I've previously stated that I have custom browser code that allows me to see what blocked people post, but I can't see the text when they are quoted by others ... yet ... long term, delayed project.

You can relax now.
 
userque said:
Don't be so simple-minded. Let me help you:

I put him on ignore years ago, don't even remember why.
Upon my return to posting, I noticed that I agree with a lot of his posts.
So I took him off block.
I've previously stated that I have custom browser code that allows me to see what blocked people post, but I can't see the text when they are quoted by others ... yet ... long term, delayed project.

You can relax now.
More...

So you have customer browser code that allows you to see what people you put on ignore post. Why would you put them on ignore then? Seems rather silly to have custom code show you what you purposely enabled the forum software to block.

But not a whole lot about you makes any sense to normal people not on the spectrum.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top