This is the kind of thing that happens when a society accepts homosexuality

[stu]

Quote from jem:

Well I suggest you start posting the opinions of educated people. Because your opinion does not mean squat.



Bernard Carr is an astronomer at Queen Mary University, London. ...

But what it comes down to is that there are these physical constants that can’t be explained. It seems clear that there is fine tuning, and you either need a tuner, who chooses the constants so that we arise, or you need a multiverse, and then we have to be in one of the universes where the constants are right for life.”



http://www.philosophypress.co.uk/?p=137

I already realize you can't think for yourself Jem you've made that abundantly clear. You just take what an educated person is quoted as saying at face value if it fits with your own uneducated view point.

So when an educated person says he thinks the universe has a tuner or there are multiverses, you blindly accept it, and repeat it like a robot, because you imagine it supports your dreams for a tuner.

But when another educated person says the universe was not intelligently designed, you alter what he says so it fits your dreams for a tuner.

So hey, you're right for once. Because you cannot think critically or be honest about what educated people say, your opinion does not mean squat.

 

[Lucrum]

I can't help but notice that a thread originally about society accepting male perverts banging each others stink holes then licking each other clean after wards has morphed into an argument over the Constitution and now the universe.

 

[jem]

Stu here is a post from a person with a doctorate....

Quote from jem:

thats the point Stu... who cares what you think. What you think does not mean squat. Nor does what I think..

I provide quotes from physicists... you provide the ramblings of STU. I do not even read your shit on this subject anymore.

I just post quotes from people who have the education and background to understand the issue. Like Bernard Carr.

Shall I post the quote again.

 

[stu]

Quote from jem:

Stu here is a post from a person with a doctorate....

..in what, imbecility?

 

[jem]

The one that debates a zealous atheist, thinking that the atheist is capable of accepting truth.

 

[stu]

Quote from jem:

The one that debates a zealous atheist, thinking that the atheist is capable of accepting truth.

Altering and distorting quotes of what people actually say , focusing only on quotes that sound like they support your own conclusions, and calling people names because they won't accept such bullshit, is hardly anything like truth.

It's just ignorance and arrogance born from not thinking for yourself.

 

[jem]

Bernard Carr is an astronomer at Queen Mary University, London. ...

But what it comes down to is that there are these physical constants that can’t be explained. It seems clear that there is fine tuning, and you either need a tuner, who chooses the constants so that we arise, or you need a multiverse, and then we have to be in one of the universes where the constants are right for life.”



http://www.philosophypress.co.uk/?p=137

I cut and post quotes from scientists. You post unsupported spew of Stu.

 

[stu]

Quote from jem:

I cut and post quotes from scientists.

Anyone can do that.
What you obviously can't do is be honest about what they say.

Susskind doesn’t say what you say he does.
Bernard Carr is saying nothing scientific. He is voicing his own personal philosophical view. A view shot down by other scientists and physicists all the time.

You have no worthy debate, it's all Jem phlem.
A superstitious infantile idea about an imaginary magic cloud wizard creator. And you’re trying to drag the word "scientist" into that nonsense anyway you can in the hope of attaching some cred to it.
21st century adult intellect of the theist - pathetic.