On the contrary. I think the reason Trump barely mustered a reaction is precisely because the audience was not "hand selected." That, and his actual "contribution" to the debate.
I'm tellin' you guys, we've seen Peak Trump.
On the contrary. I think the reason Trump barely mustered a reaction is precisely because the audience was not "hand selected." That, and his actual "contribution" to the debate.
How should it have gone? With the moderators just asking the hopefuls how really, really bad Obama is? I think CNN comported itself very well. They covered issues important to conservatives, but they also made the candidates deal with what they had said about one another. How is that not relevant? Words have meaning.The leftist media establishment got just what they wanted out of this debacle. Most of the debate was adolescent minded insults, with Trump being Trump, an asshole. Carly and Christie were head and shoulders above the rest. The entire group should have walked off the stage after the first 10 minutes. That would have made a better statement about who they are and just how tired of the same-o same-o media nonsense. It was a cluster F of nonsense, just as the left planned it.
Words have meaning.
So words only have meaning when you agree with them? That's the litmus test? Makes SCOTUS rather redundant in that case, wouldn't you say? And you, rather...Trumpish.Not according to SCOTUS
The audience was hand selected, imo. Trump is crushing the polls and barely mustered a reaction. Stragglers pushing neocon talking points won huge applause. They also won applause parroting Trumps agenda (immigration enforcement) and didn't applaud trump for same.