What information? What "lecture"? Analyze what? You're spouting a bunch of total and utter gibberish. You need a qualified mental health worker to "analyze" it and I don't think there's anyone on this site who fits this description (although, judging by his reference to DSM-IV, atticus sounds like a dabbler).Quote from bwolinsky:
That wasn't the point. The information is geniuinely useful. Despite the reactions there hasn't been any criticism that has anything at all to do with that lecture. Only pissing from afar as I heard a graphic designer state whenever his designs make it into public display. There isn't anything critiqued or discussed, thus nothing but useless banter and irrelevant responses.
It's obvious no one wants to analyze because it wasn't in their textbooks wherever they went to school or even if they went to school. It's certainly not at a secondary educational grade level but is intended for people with post secondary and post-graduate or graduate research experience.
(At least I'm not telling you I trade based on which color Jim Cramer's Tie is, or use the color wheel to determine when to put my 10 lot ES on).
And please, why not take it a bit slower and master spelling before you delve into topological probability? Did you mean to say "physicians"?Quote from bwolinsky:
The difference between quantitative stock analysts, system developers, brokers, investment advisors and CTA's is the same difference as that between Quantum Phsyicists, Particle Phsycisits, Nuclear Scientists, Nuclear Research Scientists, and any teacher they might have had in the fourth grade.
Quote from Martinghoul:
What information? What "lecture"? Analyze what? You're spouting a bunch of total and utter gibberish. You need a qualified mental health worker to "analyze" it and I don't think there's anyone on this site who fits this description (although, judging by his reference to DSM-IV, atticus sounds like a dabbler).
And please, why not take it a bit slower and master spelling before you delve into topological probability? Did you mean to say "physicians"?
Quote from Martinghoul:
What information? What "lecture"? Analyze what? You're spouting a bunch of total and utter gibberish. You need a qualified mental health worker to "analyze" it and I don't think there's anyone on this site who fits this description (although, judging by his reference to DSM-IV, atticus sounds like a dabbler).
And please, why not take it a bit slower and master spelling before you delve into topological probability? Did you mean to say "physicians"?
Hmmm, I am naive and uneducated about mathematics? Interesting...Quote from bwolinsky:
No, I meant and did mean "topological probability."
Since you are naieve and undeducated about advanced mathematics, I don't care to explain his research to you, but that is indeed what it is called.
Whatever you say, mate, whatever you say...Quote from bwolinsky:
If you analyzed the information and took notes for the lecture, then you'll see the genius behind it and what he was trying to say about our financial systems and how to derive value. It is an impeccable description of stock analysis.
Quote from Martinghoul:
Hmmm, I am naive and uneducated about mathematics? Interesting...
Why don't you go ahead and educate me? Define "topological probability" for me. Be as precise as you like...
Whatever you say, mate, whatever you say...
Quote from ammo:
http://www.propublica.org/article/t...d-helped-keep-the-housing-bubble-going/single .... is this an example
not your cap, the tpdbs created to pbsd and ebsr to contain the bsts,the best part of that article is the 40 billion loss and the 159 million fineQuote from bwolinsky:
A (t)opological (p)robability (dbs)istribution can be created by (p)arsing(bs d)ata into sections and (e)xtending the (bsr)adius around them so that all of the data is contained in the (bst)opological( s)pace.
Right, so you don't have a clue and yet you open your mouth to issue a random string of mathematical-sounding terms? How about starting w/a more basic concept that you use, a "topological space"? Do you know the definition of that?Quote from bwolinsky:
A topological probability distribution can be created by parsing data into sections and extending the radius around them so that all of the data is contained in the topological space. This is the limited extent that I understand his work, and, maybe in the future, I'll ask him for the link when he publishes it. He's a brilliant mathematician. Any Stanford PhD in topology is.
Since I doubt there have been very many PhD's given in topology I think it is very safe to say he is one of a few that might have earned this post-graduate degree.