This Forum overtrades options

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think I can write as well as bwolinsky. For example:

Recent advances in stable communication and classical algorithms are rarely at odds with IPv6. In this position paper, we demonstrate the essential unification of the partition table and expert systems that would allow for further study into superblocks [11,21]. In our research, we disconfirm that 16 bit architectures can be made atomic, virtual, and linear-time.

Many mathematicians would agree that, had it not been for vacuum tubes, the refinement of flip-flop gates might never have occurred. An unproven issue in cyberinformatics is the investigation of evolutionary programming. While such a hypothesis at first glance seems perverse, it is supported by related work in the field. To what extent can thin clients be simulated to surmount this problem?
 
Quote from ammo:

bo,toss out all your education for now and STEP 1:just use your head to correctly predict 70% of the time where the market is headed,once you have that ... STEP 2,take all your education and figure out a way to max extrapolation with the capital you have,step 2 won't work until you have figured out step 1...that is if you want to trade directionally...the other option is to learn options like atticus and make money regardless of where the market goes , buying or selling under priced /overpriced options and flattening out when they come back in line.....hyping your band skills and gpa..is just that ..hype...if you have a gift ..max it out....don't b.s yourself or your clients..you will end up driving a semi from town to town setting up and tearing down carnivals for the rest of your life..theoretically

70% <b>is</b> our win percentage overall. My carnival has rides that go upside down.

(I know I said high 90's but that's too high, might be closer to 80's and hft intervals win percentages are about 60-75%).
 
Quote from atticus:

Hey Colonel, let us know when you're done arbitraging the 5th helping of biscuits and gravy. One thing is clear; pooling is a quick trip out of this business. I know you are not a CPO.

Partnership paperwork is all you need.
 
Quote from atticus:

So paper-trading using e-signal data has you up 16%! I take it all back! Fire-up the BC Bud and thorazine!

Atticus, it's real dough. 1 tick slippage in backtests per side?
 
Quote from atticus:

I understand you're in violation of SEC, FINRA and/or CFTC regs depending on the product.

Wolinsky is just a wannabe scammer.

You're incorrect. We have partners who have what they need IE: Partnership paperwork.
 
Quote from kinggyppo:

man we need to send you after MF Global how about a 10% finders fee, I bet you could find the money before I sit down for turkey. You should have been a detective, LOL!

I worked at DST Systems so accounting with "3270" was all it would have taken to skip trace the cash.
 
Quote from sle:
I think I can write as well as bwolinsky. For example:
I'm sorry, mate, if you think this is good enough for this thread, you got another think coming. This just wasn't anywhere near the bwol standard.

To paraphrase Darth Vader, "Impressive, young Skywalker, but you're not a Jedi yet!". There can be only one bwol!
 
If you guys are having trouble following my white papers, the speech is at the end broken up into sections read by the adobe acrobat male reading voice.

http://www.youtube.com/user/BWolinsky?feature=mhee#p/c/4B54BE9AAA7B0909/0/Cl4V0V5Cdqk

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/videoseries?list=PL4B54BE9AAA7B0909&amp;hl=en_US" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Here is the speech Financial Science read aloud:

http://www.youtube.com/user/BWolinsky?feature=mhee#p/c/D2FFF77C6819CD12/0/Ioc_fHdXjW0

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/videoseries?list=PLD2FFF77C6819CD12&amp;hl=en_US" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top