I understand that as a method of exchange, on-chain bitcoin transactions aren't ideal. I see the future as the base layer settling high value transactions and everyone else goes to some L2.
Fiat will of course always exist, but when you understand that this system is based on debt, and the debt needs to keep growing, which means money supply needs to keep increasing so you can pay the debt, it becomes obvious that holding any fiat is just dumb. In many countries, they know how bad fiat is, and the USD will be the last to fall.
If you think about, its not even the dollar that has been a store of value but real estate and other tangible assets. These are of course risky in their own right, and so what is left as a store of value? I do believe bitcoin will take the lion's share. Shit, the Chinese real estate market is even bigger than the US equity market. Imagine when that implodes.... The smart will get into bitcoin before its too late.
I don't understand half of your reply though since I am just a 17yo playing FPS.![]()
FX is not intended as a store of value. When was the last time you bought a burger with fractional-gold or property? I do not dispute (specifically) BTC as a store of value. I am not a crypto-hater. It's fundamentally no different than gold is that respect.
You're arguing against fractional-reserve. That's entirely another discussion. What caused FTX's collapse? Too much success? I know I am conflating management with the asset but fractional-reserve is not the argument you think that it is.