There is no heaven no hell

Quote from SnakeEYE:

Maybe i`m gambling,but..How do you know that 'good' IS the good and 'bad' IS the bad.?Why can`t it be otherwise?This is the never ending story and its elements replace each other all your life,and all your life you keep staying in doubt,and will.I won`t believe that the very holiest person on the Earth belives without a doubt.Even Jesus,if he ever exists,is said,had doubts.

I do not deny the existent religions,i just want to be free,staying neutral first and then above of it.
More...
Whatever.
 
Quote from pspr:
You are gambling that you are correct and you don't have to concern yourself with being good or being bad or having failth because you will not go to either heaven or hell. Now, that's a gamble.
More...
Having no concern for faith simply does not correlate with no concern for good or bad. Suggesting otherwise is irrational.

Holding irrational and illogical beliefs in something which is supposed to have equipped you with rationality, is what doesn't sound like a good bet.
You are gambling it's not going to get pissed at you for being so ridiculous.
 
Quote from jem:

Nothing new about the idea that the books in the bible may have been written by somebody else.

I took a bible as lit class in 10th grade, in public school.. We went over the Q source... and when reviewing the new testament we discussed that matthew mark and luke were probably from the same original source --- likely oral before it was recorded. So the idea that this was done by individuals committing forgery is a bit of a stretch.
More...
You were discussing if some gospels were a likely source for some more gospels?
That's like discussing if Doctor Watson's stories on Sherlock Holmes were from the original source - The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes.
 
Sexual abuse by priests compared to the stats of the general population is on the bottom of the list. Stats by profession or vocation, abuse is higher for many other occupations, teachers for instance.
 
Quote from stupid:

Having no concern for faith simply does not correlate with no concern for good or bad. Suggesting otherwise is irrational.

Holding irrational and illogical beliefs in something which is supposed to have equipped you with rationality, is what doesn't sound like a good bet.
You are gambling it's not going to get pissed at you for being so ridiculous.
More...
What a STUpid argument. Try to comprehend what I said.
 
Quote from stu:

You were discussing if some gospels were a likely source for some more gospels?
That's like discussing if Doctor Watson's stories on Sherlock Holmes were from the original source - The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes.
More...

Stu, half clown half troll, denying history again.

Note, Stu is now trying to act like atheists do not deny the existence of God they only have no belief or no concern for faith.

He trolls these boards looking to turn any statement about faith into a ugly fight.

However, he does not have the balls to state whether he denies the existence of God.
 
Quote from pspr:

What a STUpid argument. Try to comprehend what I said.
More...
Quote from jem:

Stu, half clown half troll, denying history again.

Note, Stu is now trying to act like atheists do not deny the existence of God they only have no belief or no concern for faith.

He trolls these boards looking to turn any statement about faith into a ugly fight.

However, he does not have the balls to state whether he denies the existence of God.
More...
Just the usual nutty blind believers response then.

One that can only manage ad hominem and..
One paranoid reply that has no relevance to what preceded it.
Par for the course.
 
Quote from jem:

Stu, half clown half troll, denying history again.

Note, Stu is now trying to act like atheists do not deny the existence of God they only have no belief or no concern for faith.

He trolls these boards looking to turn any statement about faith into a ugly fight.

However, he does not have the balls to state whether he denies the existence of God.
More...

+1

Stu likes his own writing. :D
 
Quote from stu:

Just the usual nutty blind believers response then.

One that can only manage ad hominem and..
One paranoid reply that has no relevance to what preceded it.
Par for the course.
More...
Stu, I would put you on ignore with sameeh but you are mostly harmless. Just really, really.....well STUpid. :p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top