Quote from allenhobbs:
Inane, the entire thread. At first I thought it was a parody ala "who's on first?", etc., etc., but then realized the OP and TD are serious which is scary.

Quote from allenhobbs:
Inane, the entire thread. At first I thought it was a parody ala "who's on first?", etc., etc., but then realized the OP and TD are serious which is scary.
Quote from cabletrader:
As for TudorJones of course he's serious, but what's even funnier is he actually thinks he's convincing people so he just carries on regardless, in blissful ignorance!
I hate to admit this landis, but I couldn't agree w you more on this one.Quote from Landis82:
The fact that BARON allows this thread and this person to continue posting just goes to show you that he couldn't careless about the quality of content on ET.
As someone that worked for PTJ in the early days in 1986 as a full-employee, I can honestly say that this guy is a complete idiot, not too mention delusional.
But don't let that stop him from posting more garbage . . . He must be on Baron's "payroll" to keep web-activity up.
ET has clearly made new "lows".
And the ironic thing about it is that BARON couldn't care less by his condoning such threads as this one.
Quote from Landis82:
ET has clearly made new "lows".
And the ironic thing about it is that BARON couldn't care less by his condoning such threads as this one.