The suddenly relevant debate about whether a president can be prosecuted, explained

Max E. Pad said:
The campaign does not = Trump specifically, the campaign = Manafort and Flynn. Why hasnt he denied telling Trump he was not under investigation?
More...


"any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government "

1.Trump is associated with the Trump campaign.Not only is he associated with it,he's the head of it.

2.Comey might have told Trump he was not under investigation.Police,feds and prosecutors lie to suspects all the time.The Supreme Court say they can.
 
Tony Stark said:
"any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government "

1.Trump is associated with the Trump campaign.Not only is he associated with it,he's the head of it.

2.Comey might have told Trump he was not under investigation.Police,feds and prosecutors lie to suspects all the time.The Supreme Court say they can.
More...


So shit has leaked about just about every single thing going on inside of the FBI, about every single investigation, but they are holding off on leaking the damning evidence about Trump? LOL, what do you think the plot is here? Is the plot to just slowly try to drive Trump insane?
 
Max E. Pad said:
But hes going to go testify about it, he didnt think to tell someone on the investigation committee before this? There is all kinds of avenues he could have used before if he thought it was "a very big deal" In his words.
More...


To many assumptions you are using as facts.He has stated in one of those hearings that he had information he could not release publicly.
 
Max E. Pad said:
So shit has leaked about just about every single thing going on inside of the FBI, about every single investigation, but they are holding off on leaking the damning evidence about Trump? LOL, what do you think the plot is here? Is the plot to just slowly try to drive Trump insane?
More...


You are assuming everything has been leaked.If they really wanted to impeach Trump they wouldn't leak information that would jeopardize the investigation.
 
Tony Stark said:
You are assuming everything has been leaked.If they really wanted to impeach Trump they wouldn't leak information that would jeopardize the investigation.
More...


If they really had anything worth impeaching Trump on it would have leaked, and it would have been enough to impeach/ruin him, why has not 1 piece of evidence came out regarding Trump?

Also you saying that the Trump campaign = Trump is like me saying Obama was under investigation when they were looking at Lois Lerner, Or saying Obama was underinvestigation because of Tony Rezko, or Rod Blagoievich.

Its Occams Razor dude, the simplest explanation is generally the right one.
 
Max E. Pad said:
If they really had anything worth impeaching Trump on it would have leaked, and it would have been enough to impeach/ruin him, why has not 1 piece of evidence came out regarding Trump?

Also you saying that the Trump campaign = Trump is like me saying Obama was under investigation when they were looking at Lois Lerner.

Its Occams Razor dude, the simplest explanation is generally the right one.
More...


You say everything has been leaked but we didn't even know for certain that The FBI has been investigating Trump/Russia since July until recently.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top