Good1.. the socialist bit in Nazi was to pull the wool over the eyes at the time. Socialism was a popular idea so they incorporated it and public works projects made their corporatist/fascist backers very happy. He also wanted infrastructure for his war plans.
You have it all arseways because labels mean too much to you.
Monty Python can explain it better. Notice the dictator, military and the rich man.
Wrong. If you want to talk about facism, all you really can possibly mean is socialism with unfair favoritism in the tax-and-redistribute side of the equation. Corporations still pay taxes...still participate in socialism. They are more or less favored in the tax-and-redistribute equation. It could become unfair. But the unfairness emphasizes the fact that the populace is being taxed heavily, hence, socialism!
As I said, the only way to make socialism work, especially as it gets heavier and heavier, is to increase cohesiveness. Nationalism increases cohesiveness.
A fair rule of law increaees cohesiveness around the nation of law. Given an unfair rule of claw, and clash systems, you have to rely on more base ways of creating cohesion around factors such as ethnicity.
Hitler hyped the ethnic factor to get the people to swallow a heavy (corporate favoring?), socialist system that may well have been unfair to too many. It certainly manifested itself as unfair to its neighbors, who were force-included in the socialist side of the taxing equation.
