The Simple Explanation for Trump Firing James Comey When He Did

The Simple Explanation for Trump Firing James Comey When He Did
by JOEL B. POLLAK9 May 20176738

The case for firing former FBI Director James Comey has been made at length by both Democrats and Republicans.

Last July, Republicans were angry that he failed to indict Hillary Clinton, and Democrats were angry that he made a case for doing so. In October, Democrats were furious that Comey revealed that he had re-opened the investigation into Clinton, and in March, Republicans were angry that he disputed President Donald Trump’s wiretapping claims.

Comey was, arguably, dealt an impossible hand by the Obama administration. Regardless, within the Department of Justice and beyond, Comey had — perhaps with good intentions — undermined his credibility, and that of the FBI.

But why fire Comey now? The answer is simple. The day before, President Barack Obama’s former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper repeated, under oath, what he told NBC News’ Chuck Todd on Meet the Press on March 5 — that he had seen no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. That gave the Trump administration the breathing room to dismiss Comey — which it simply did not have before.

It is true that Trump did not have an attorney general and assistant attorney general in place until relatively late, but he could have acted before then — though having their recommendation certainly adds weight to his decision.

Put simply, if Trump had fired Comey while there were still serious questions about Russia, then it would have been more plausible to accuse him of trying to interfere in the investigation or cover up whatever happened. It is now clear that nothing, in fact, happened. Monday’s hearing with Clapper and former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates was meant to reveal a “smoking gun,” and produced nothing but viral videos of Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX).

The more Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and his media allies try to hype the Comey firing as the new Watergate, and revive the Russia conspiracy theory, the more they help Trump by making fools of themselves.
 
About time
 

Attachments

  • ObamaFireComey.jpg
    ObamaFireComey.jpg
    139.6 KB · Views: 10
This is going nowhere. Let the Dems have a 48 orgasm hoping this is another Watergate. It isn't. No where close.
 
The Simple Explanation for Trump Firing James Comey When He Did
by JOEL B. POLLAK9 May 20176738

The case for firing former FBI Director James Comey has been made at length by both Democrats and Republicans.

Last July, Republicans were angry that he failed to indict Hillary Clinton, and Democrats were angry that he made a case for doing so. In October, Democrats were furious that Comey revealed that he had re-opened the investigation into Clinton, and in March, Republicans were angry that he disputed President Donald Trump’s wiretapping claims.

Comey was, arguably, dealt an impossible hand by the Obama administration. Regardless, within the Department of Justice and beyond, Comey had — perhaps with good intentions — undermined his credibility, and that of the FBI.

But why fire Comey now? The answer is simple. The day before, President Barack Obama’s former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper repeated, under oath, what he told NBC News’ Chuck Todd on Meet the Press on March 5 — that he had seen no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. That gave the Trump administration the breathing room to dismiss Comey — which it simply did not have before.

It is true that Trump did not have an attorney general and assistant attorney general in place until relatively late, but he could have acted before then — though having their recommendation certainly adds weight to his decision.

Put simply, if Trump had fired Comey while there were still serious questions about Russia, then it would have been more plausible to accuse him of trying to interfere in the investigation or cover up whatever happened. It is now clear that nothing, in fact, happened. Monday’s hearing with Clapper and former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates was meant to reveal a “smoking gun,” and produced nothing but viral videos of Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX).

The more Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and his media allies try to hype the Comey firing as the new Watergate, and revive the Russia conspiracy theory, the more they help Trump by making fools of themselves.
Thanks, that was delightfully preposterous and a great chuckle to start the day. Don't ever lose that sense of humor.
 
That sounds about right. Hard to fire a guy who the media claims is uncovering credible evidence of collusion between Trump and Putin in exchange for a resort in Moscow. He got him on camera under oath saying there was no evidence of Trump involvement in the investigation and now the democrats are crying over spilt milk.
 
Thanks, that was delightfully preposterous and a great chuckle to start the day. Don't ever lose that sense of humor.
You don't think Trump has the ability to politically outmaneuver the libtard press and dems?

Do you think that there is a possibility that this is just bait?

If the FBI finds no collusion between Trump and Russians, do you think Trump can use that to make dems look like fools?
 
Yeah, I have to laugh at stuff I don't like sometimes in order for it to be easier to accept. So I sympathize, Fred.
You mean like when the leader of a country takes self-serving actions that threaten the very integrity of its institutions? Yeah, I can imagine.
 
You don't think Trump has the ability to politically outmaneuver the libtard press and dems?

Do you think that there is a possibility that this is just bait?

If the FBI finds no collusion between Trump and Russians, do you think Trump can use that to make dems look like fools?
Unlike with his previous stupid antics, I don't think he'll be able to construct evidence after the fact to justify his actions.

As has been reported in the real news press (not Brightfart), this was a decision in search of a rationale.

I'd say Trump's tenure just got a bit more tenuous.
 
Back
Top