It may be shocking (considering the propaganda that is taught in schools, etc) but with nearly 100 years of data the world over it is proven that races have different average intelligence levels, and in fact are measurably different on a broad range of criteria. It is not just "the big races" but in fact within what most consider a "race" there are subgroups with distinctly different average characteristics.
There are also statistically significant physical differences. The notion of race, (thought it is a fuzzy concept for most people) is real. It might be better to think of it as a persons historical origins. For example there are "Europeans" "africans" and "asians". These are groups with distinct differences. Within the group there are sub-groups. Within Europe, for example, there are Eastern Europeans, Northern Europeans, Southern Europeans. Back when anthropology was a scientific field (physical anthropology) rather than a social "science" (cultural anthropology) They had classified many of these differences and given names to them more precise that what I have done above.
The reality is that different people have made different cultures that are suited to both their biological or genetic traits as well as the physical space in the world where they found themselves in for most of their history.
It may shock liberals but the African male behavior pattern that is so troubling in the USA is in fact the same thousands of year old behavior pattern that exists in africa, only in their own native culture it is not seen as a problem, it is a way of life. It is who they are.
The issue for Europeans seems to be that we have had so much "white guilt" thrown at us we can't think clearly about the situation, or if we try a representative for the ruling order shouts us down.
Therefor, it might be easiest to think about the issue with regards to non-europeans. For example, do North Asians and Sub saharan africans have equal intelligence? do they have the same physical potentials? Do they have an equal ability to create advanced civilization or culture? Well, measurably, there are differences on ALL these things regardless of how you choose to measure it. This is not bad or good, it just is. It is not subject to debate, it is fact, and for most everyone with eyes and a brain, it is common sense.
Here in the USA we have christian churches importing Africans who still practice female genital mutilation. They believe in honor killings. Folks, these african refuges are part of a people who have an average IQ of below 80. It will be impossible for them to fit in and integrate into society. Most of them are on public assistance and are bankrupting the small towns that they descend upon. The refuges from haiti have started a crime epidemic in small town America, but you will not hear it from the main stream media.
Liberal optimism unfortunately has blinded the majority of Americans to stone cold reality of racial difference.
THe powers that be believe there is no problem in bringing in people from religious groups that are openly hostile to the majority (still at this point) american culture. Folks, this is flat out dangerous. When a critical mass of population is achieved, I predict that like in the rest of the world, open, aggressive hostilities will break out on a large scale. Small population minority groups have an incentive it at least in some ways "blend in". In a fragmented society this is not the case.
Mexicans (the illegals are not "hispanics" they are by and large mexican indians) have created huge problems in the USA, such as our collapsing system of public hospitals and overflowing criminal justice system. If you think there will not be a growing problem/conflict, I invite you to visit a major city on May-Day. You will see tens of thousands of Mexicans waiving the mexican flag, carrying socialist and communist banners, and in general proclaiming with their signage that they are retaking the USA. If you think American politicians are bad now, just wait until the same people who voted in Chavez are a substantial voter block in every state. It is the lefts wet dream, and it is the true reason our borders are being left open. It is not an oversight, it is a strategy.
Folks, the bottom line is that a country or a society cannot rise above the attributes of those who live there. Nothing can create a "high performing" school if the average IQ of the student population is around 80. Those that value advanced civilization and a peaceful society with a high quality of life must realize that globally, it is north asians and western/northern europeans who have succeeded in creating such societies, who have the potential to both create and maintain such societies.
Mass population replacement will not "lift" others into America, it will sink America to a third or second world nation. If you live in a wealth bubble (a wealthy area in an urban center, a wealthy suburb, etc) or "white utopia" (condescending term liberals use to describe prosperous, peaceful white communities). I urge you to get out of the bubble and see with your own eyes what is really at stake.
There are also statistically significant physical differences. The notion of race, (thought it is a fuzzy concept for most people) is real. It might be better to think of it as a persons historical origins. For example there are "Europeans" "africans" and "asians". These are groups with distinct differences. Within the group there are sub-groups. Within Europe, for example, there are Eastern Europeans, Northern Europeans, Southern Europeans. Back when anthropology was a scientific field (physical anthropology) rather than a social "science" (cultural anthropology) They had classified many of these differences and given names to them more precise that what I have done above.
The reality is that different people have made different cultures that are suited to both their biological or genetic traits as well as the physical space in the world where they found themselves in for most of their history.
It may shock liberals but the African male behavior pattern that is so troubling in the USA is in fact the same thousands of year old behavior pattern that exists in africa, only in their own native culture it is not seen as a problem, it is a way of life. It is who they are.
The issue for Europeans seems to be that we have had so much "white guilt" thrown at us we can't think clearly about the situation, or if we try a representative for the ruling order shouts us down.
Therefor, it might be easiest to think about the issue with regards to non-europeans. For example, do North Asians and Sub saharan africans have equal intelligence? do they have the same physical potentials? Do they have an equal ability to create advanced civilization or culture? Well, measurably, there are differences on ALL these things regardless of how you choose to measure it. This is not bad or good, it just is. It is not subject to debate, it is fact, and for most everyone with eyes and a brain, it is common sense.
Here in the USA we have christian churches importing Africans who still practice female genital mutilation. They believe in honor killings. Folks, these african refuges are part of a people who have an average IQ of below 80. It will be impossible for them to fit in and integrate into society. Most of them are on public assistance and are bankrupting the small towns that they descend upon. The refuges from haiti have started a crime epidemic in small town America, but you will not hear it from the main stream media.
Liberal optimism unfortunately has blinded the majority of Americans to stone cold reality of racial difference.
THe powers that be believe there is no problem in bringing in people from religious groups that are openly hostile to the majority (still at this point) american culture. Folks, this is flat out dangerous. When a critical mass of population is achieved, I predict that like in the rest of the world, open, aggressive hostilities will break out on a large scale. Small population minority groups have an incentive it at least in some ways "blend in". In a fragmented society this is not the case.
Mexicans (the illegals are not "hispanics" they are by and large mexican indians) have created huge problems in the USA, such as our collapsing system of public hospitals and overflowing criminal justice system. If you think there will not be a growing problem/conflict, I invite you to visit a major city on May-Day. You will see tens of thousands of Mexicans waiving the mexican flag, carrying socialist and communist banners, and in general proclaiming with their signage that they are retaking the USA. If you think American politicians are bad now, just wait until the same people who voted in Chavez are a substantial voter block in every state. It is the lefts wet dream, and it is the true reason our borders are being left open. It is not an oversight, it is a strategy.
Folks, the bottom line is that a country or a society cannot rise above the attributes of those who live there. Nothing can create a "high performing" school if the average IQ of the student population is around 80. Those that value advanced civilization and a peaceful society with a high quality of life must realize that globally, it is north asians and western/northern europeans who have succeeded in creating such societies, who have the potential to both create and maintain such societies.
Mass population replacement will not "lift" others into America, it will sink America to a third or second world nation. If you live in a wealth bubble (a wealthy area in an urban center, a wealthy suburb, etc) or "white utopia" (condescending term liberals use to describe prosperous, peaceful white communities). I urge you to get out of the bubble and see with your own eyes what is really at stake.