China is not monocultural in any meaningful sense of the word, other than they all live to some degree under a centrally-controlled bureaucracy.
huh? 90% Han Chinese is pretty close in my book.
When China does have internal political strife guess where it usually comes from?
The point is that if multicultural was good and mono was bad as according to the high priests of the left, then places like Japan have no business being successful and places like India should be ruling the world. I think Germany and Japan were strong because of a single dominant culture, not in spite of it.
Human behavior is not physical law, there are only tendencies, and of course if you have one dominant culture and it is corrupt then you'll have big problems (like Russia). There will always be exceptions but when you look at the world and start to ask how the multiculturals have worked out (internal harmony, economic progress, etc.) versus the mono culturals, the evidence is plain to me.
Once upon a time in 1860 the United states had two large groups of people with different ideas of how life should be run. After that event though the rise of the USA was not because we had several large dominant cultures, it was because everyone
wanted to be an american and the common values of that early america were some of the best values brought over from northern Europe. Now hispanics, blacks, muslims, etc. want to maintain a seperate cultural identity and even a seperate language sometimes. They scoff at the values which built this place as racist, and are supported by white leftists. You can see it coming, once they collectively take over the voting majority- well I hope you like mexico a lot.